首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neuroscience >A Comparison between Mechanisms of Multi-Alternative Perceptual Decision Making: Ability to Explain Human Behavior Predictions for Neurophysiology and Relationship with Decision Theory
【2h】

A Comparison between Mechanisms of Multi-Alternative Perceptual Decision Making: Ability to Explain Human Behavior Predictions for Neurophysiology and Relationship with Decision Theory

机译:多种选择的感知决策机制之间的比较:解释人类行为的能力神经生理学的预测以及与决策理论的关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While there seems to be relatively wide agreement about perceptual decision making relying on integration-to-threshold mechanisms, proposed models differ in a variety of details. This study compares a range of mechanisms for multi-alternative perceptual decision making, including integration with and without leakage, feedforward and feedback inhibition for mediating the competition between integrators, as well as linear and non-linear mechanisms for combining signals across alternatives. It is shown that a number of mechanisms make very similar predictions for the decision behavior and are therefore able to explain previously published data from a multi-alternative perceptual decision task. However, it is also demonstrated that the mechanisms differ in their internal dynamics and therefore make different predictions for neuorphysiological experiments. The study further addresses the relationship of these mechanisms with decision theory and statistical testing and analyzes their optimality.
机译:尽管关于依赖阈值集成机制的感知决策似乎达成了相对广泛的共识,但建议的模型在许多细节上有所不同。这项研究比较了多种多样的感知决策机制,包括有无泄漏的整合,前馈和反馈抑制(用于调节集成商之间的竞争)以及线性和非线性机制,用于跨备选方案组合信号。结果表明,许多机制对决策行为做出了非常相似的预测,因此能够解释来自多替代感知决策任务的先前发布的数据。但是,也证明了这些机制的内部动力学不同,因此对神经生理学实验做出了不同的预测。该研究进一步探讨了这些机制与决策理论和统计检验之间的关系,并分析了它们的最优性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号