首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Psychology >Behavioral laterality of the brain: support for the binary construct of hemisity
【2h】

Behavioral laterality of the brain: support for the binary construct of hemisity

机译:大脑的行为偏侧性:支持偏侧性的二元结构

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Three terms define brain behavioral laterality: hemispheric dominance identifies the cerebral hemisphere producing one's first language. Hemispheric asymmetry locates the brain side of non-language skills. A third term is needed to describe a person's binary thinking, learning, and behaving styles. Since the 1950s split-brain studies, evidence has accumulated that individuals with right or left brain behavioral orientations (RPs or LPs) exist. Originally, hemisphericity sought, but failed, to confirm the existence of such individual differences, due to its assertion that each individual lay somewhere on a gradient between competing left and right brain extremes. Recently, hemisity, a more accurate behavioral laterality context, has emerged. It posits that one's behavioral laterality is binary: i.e., inherently either right or left brain-oriented. This insight enabled the quantitative determination of right or left behavioral laterality of thousands of subjects. MRI scans of right and left brain-oriented groups revealed two neuroanatomical differences. The first was an asymmetry of an executive element in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). This provided hemisity both a rationale and a primary standard. RPs and LPs gave opposite answers to many behavioral preference “either-or,” forced choice questions. This showed that several sex vs. hemisity traits are being conflated by society. Such was supported by the second neuroanatomical difference between the hemisity subtypes, that RPs of either sex had up to three times larger corpus callosi than LPs. Individuals of the same hemisity but opposite sex had more personality traits in common than those of the same sex but different hemisity. Although hemisity subtypes were equally represented in the general population, the process of higher education and career choice caused substantial hemisity sorting among the professions. Hemisity appears to be a valid and promising area for quantitative research of behavioral laterality.
机译:三个术语定义了大脑的行为偏向性:半球优势是指大脑半球产生自己的第一语言。半球不对称位于非语言技能的大脑一侧。需要第三个术语来描述一个人的二元思维,学习方式和行为方式。自1950年代的裂脑研究以来,已有证据表明存在具有右或左脑行为取向(RP或LP)的个体。最初,半球性试图(但未能)证实这种个体差异的存在,因为它断言每个个体都位于左右两个极端大脑之间的梯度上。近来,出现了更加准确的行为偏侧性环境-混杂性。它假定一个人的行为偏向性是二元的:即固有地以右脑或左脑为导向。这种见解使定量确定了数千名受试者的左右行为偏向性成为可能。左右脑定向组的MRI扫描显示出两个神经解剖学差异。首先是前扣带回皮质(ACC)中执行元件的不对称性。这为理论和基本标准提供了混乱。 RP和LP对许多行为偏好“或非”或“强迫选择”问题给出了相反的答案。这表明社会正在混和一些性别与杂种特征。杂种亚型之间第二种神经解剖学差异支持了这一点,即两性的RP s体比LP大三倍。同性但异性的个体比同性但异性的个体具有更多的共同人格特质。尽管杂种亚型在普通人群中的分布相同,但高等教育和职业选择的过程却导致各专业之间的种种杂种排序。杂合性似乎是对行为偏侧性进行定量研究的有效和有前途的领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号