首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Psychology >Detecting false intent using eye blink measures
【2h】

Detecting false intent using eye blink measures

机译:使用眨眼措施检测错误意图

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Eye blink measures have been shown to be diagnostic in detecting deception regarding past acts. Here we examined—across two experiments with increasing degrees of ecological validity—whether changes in eye blinking can be used to determine false intent regarding future actions. In both experiments, half of the participants engaged in a mock crime and then transported an explosive device with the intent of delivering it to a “contact” that would use it to cause a disturbance. Eye blinking was measured for all participants when presented with three types of questions: relevant to intent to transport an explosive device, relevant to intent to engage in an unrelated illegal act, and neutral questions. Experiment 1 involved standing participants watching a video interviewer with audio presented ambiently. Experiment 2 involved standing participants questioned by a live interviewer. Across both experiments, changes in blink count during and immediately following individual questions, total number of blinks, and maximum blink time length differentiated those with false intent from truthful intent participants. In response to questions relevant to intent to deliver an explosive device vs. questions relevant to intent to deliver illegal drugs, those with false intent showed a suppression of blinking during the questions when compared to the 10 s period after the end of the questions, a lower number of blinks, and shorter maximum blink duration. The results are discussed in relation to detecting deception about past activities as well as to the similarities and differences to detecting false intent as described by prospective memory and arousal.
机译:眨眼措施已被证明在检测有关过去行为的欺骗方面具有诊断意义。在这里,我们通过生态有效性提高程度的两个实验,研究了眨眼的变化是否可以用于确定有关未来行为的错误意图。在这两个实验中,一半的参与者进行了模拟犯罪,然后运输了爆炸装置,目的是将其传递给“接触点”,该接触点将使用该爆炸物造成骚扰。当出现以下三种类型的问题时,对所有参与者的眨眼进行了测量:与意图运送爆炸装置有关,与意图从事无关的非法行为有关以及中立的问题。实验1涉及站立的参与者观看视频采访者的环境音频。实验2涉及常驻参与者,遭到现场采访员的质疑。在这两个实验中,眨眼计数的变化在单个问题期间和紧随其后,眨眼总数,最大眨眼时间长度方面有所不同,将那些有虚假意图的人与有真实意图的参与者区分开。在回答与意图提供爆炸装置有关的问题与与意图提供非法药物有关的问题时,与意图错误的人相比,具有错误意图的人与问题结束后的10 s期间相比,在问题中眨眼受到抑制,眨眼次数更少,最大眨眼时间更短。讨论了有关检测关于过去活动的欺骗以及与检测前瞻性记忆和唤醒所描述的虚假意图的异同有关的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号