首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Psychology >Behavioral biases when viewing multiplexed scenes: scene structure and frames of reference for inspection
【2h】

Behavioral biases when viewing multiplexed scenes: scene structure and frames of reference for inspection

机译:查看多场景时的行为偏见:场景结构和检查参考框架

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Where people look when viewing a scene has been a much explored avenue of vision research (e.g., see Tatler, ). Current understanding of eye guidance suggests that a combination of high and low-level factors influence fixation selection (e.g., Torralba et al., ), but that there are also strong biases toward the center of an image (Tatler, ). However, situations where we view multiplexed scenes are becoming increasingly common, and it is unclear how visual inspection might be arranged when content lacks normal semantic or spatial structure. Here we use the central bias to examine how gaze behavior is organized in scenes that are presented in their normal format, or disrupted by scrambling the quadrants and separating them by space. In Experiment 1, scrambling scenes had the strongest influence on gaze allocation. Observers were highly biased by the quadrant center, although physical space did not enhance this bias. However, the center of the display still contributed to fixation selection above chance, and was most influential early in scene viewing. When the top left quadrant was held constant across all conditions in Experiment 2, fixation behavior was significantly influenced by the overall arrangement of the display, with fixations being biased toward the quadrant center when the other three quadrants were scrambled (despite the visual information in this quadrant being identical in all conditions). When scenes are scrambled into four quadrants and semantic contiguity is disrupted, observers no longer appear to view the content as a single scene (despite it consisting of the same visual information overall), but rather anchor visual inspection around the four separate “sub-scenes.” Moreover, the frame of reference that observers use when viewing the multiplex seems to change across viewing time: from an early bias toward the display center to a later bias toward quadrant centers.
机译:人们在观看场景时所看的地方已经成为视觉研究的探索性途径(例如,参见Tatler,)。目前对眼球引导的理解表明,高低级因素的组合会影响注视选择(例如Torralba等人),但对图像中心的偏见也很强(Tatler,)。但是,在我们观看多路复用场景的情况下,这种情况变得越来越普遍,并且尚不清楚当内容缺乏正常的语义或空间结构时,如何安排视觉检查。在这里,我们使用中心偏差来检查以正常格式呈现的场景中的注视行为是如何组织的,或者通过扰乱象限并将其按空间分开而被打乱。在实验1中,加扰场景对注视分配的影响最大。象限中心对观察者的偏见很高,尽管物理空间并没有增强这种偏见。但是,显示的中心仍然有助于偶然选择注视,并且在场景观察的早期最具影响力。在实验2的所有条件下,当左上象限在所有条件下均保持恒定时,显示器的总体布置会极大地影响固定行为,当其他三个象限被扰乱时,固定会偏向象限中心(尽管此处显示了视觉信息)象限在所有条件下都相同)。当场景被扰乱成四个象限并且语义连续性被打乱时,观察者似乎不再将内容视为一个场景(尽管它总体上由相同的视觉信息组成),而是将视觉检查固定在四个单独的“子场景”周围。”此外,观察者在观看多路广播时使用的参考系似乎随着观看时间而变化:从朝显示中心的早期偏向向象限中心的偏向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号