首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Pediatrics >Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation Following Lich-Gregoir Technique for the Correction of Vesico-Ureteral Reflux Retrospective Comparative Study Open vs. Laparoscopy
【2h】

Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation Following Lich-Gregoir Technique for the Correction of Vesico-Ureteral Reflux Retrospective Comparative Study Open vs. Laparoscopy

机译:巫妖-格雷戈尔技术行膀胱-膀胱再植入术矫正血管-尿路反流的回顾性比较研究开放式与腹腔镜

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Introduction: The aim is to compare the outcome of open versus laparoscopic Lich-Gregoir technique in patients with vesicoureteral reflux. We report a retrospective multicenter comparative study between open and laparoscopic extra-vesical ureteral reimplantation (EVUR) following Lich-Gregoir (LG) technique for the correction of Vesico-Ureteral Reflux (VUR).>Materials and Methods: Between January 2007 and December 2015, 96 patients with VUR (69 females and 27 males) and deterioration of the renal function, underwent EVUR following LG technique. Fifty patients (16 males and 34 females) were operated by open surgery (group A). The mean age was 4.22 years-old, (14–147 months). Laparoscopic approach (group B) was performed in 46 patients (11 males and 35 females). The mean age was 4.19 years-old (15–110 months). We compared the results in relation to degree of VUR, operative time, hospital stay, post-operative pain medications, recovery time, complications, successful rate, recurrence, and follow-up. Statistical analysis was done used Chi square test for categorical variables and the Student t-test for continuous variables. P < 0.05 was considered significant.>Results: In both groups no correlation was identified between age or weight and operative time, length of stay or total analgesia used. The mean operative time for group A was 63.2 and 125.4 min for unilateral and bilateral VUR, respectively, and for the group B was 127.90 and 184.5 min, respectively. There was no conversion in the laparoscopic group. Perioperative mucosal perforation of the bladder occurred in 6 patients of group A and 4 patients of group B and was immediately repaired. One patient had to be reoperated for leakage in group B. The mean duration of Morphine, IV and PO analgesia was shorter in group B. The mean hospital stay was 5.46 days for group A and 1.54 days for Group B. The success rate was 98% in group A and 97, 8% in group B. The mean follow-up was 3.67 years for the open and 1.54 years for the laparoscopic group. Transitory voiding dysfunction occurred in bilateral EVUR in one case in each group.>Conclusion: Laparoscopic or Open approach for the correction of VUR following Lich-Gregoir technique is effective in unilateral and bilateral VUR with similar results. Laparoscopic approach reduces significantly (p < 0.05 in each item) post-operative pain medication, hospital stay, and allows for a faster return to normal activity.
机译:>简介:目的是比较开放性和腹腔镜Lich-Gregoir技术在膀胱输尿管反流患者中的效果。我们报告了利奇-格勒高(LG)技术用于矫正Vesico-Ureteral反流(VUR)的开放式和腹腔镜膀胱外膀胱输尿管再植(EVUR)的回顾性多中心比较研究。>材料和方法:在2007年1月至2015年12月之间,通过LG技术行EVUR的96例VUR患者(69例女性和27例男性)肾功能恶化。 50例患者(男16例,女34例)进行了开放手术(A组)。平均年龄为4.22岁(14-147个月)。腹腔镜入路(B组)治疗46例(男11例,女35例)。平均年龄为4.19岁(15-110个月)。我们比较了有关VUR程度,手术时间,住院时间,术后止痛药,恢复时间,并发症,成功率,复发率和随访情况的结果。使用卡方检验进行分类变量进行统计分析,使用学生t检验进行连续变量进行统计分析。 P <0.05被认为是显着的。>结果:在两组中,年龄或体重与手术时间,住院时间或所使用的总镇痛之间均无相关性。单侧和双侧VUR的A组平均手术时间分别为63.2和125.4分钟,B组的平均手术时间分别为127.90和184.5分钟。腹腔镜组未发生转换。 A组6例和B组4例发生围手术期膀胱粘膜穿孔,并立即修复。 B组中有1例因渗漏而不得不再次手术。B组中吗啡,IV和PO镇痛的平均持续时间较短。A组的平均住院天数为5.46天,B组的平均住院天数为1.54天。成功率为98 A组为97%,B组为8%。开腹平均随访时间为3.67年,腹腔镜组平均随访时间为1.54年。每组中有1例双侧EVUR发生短暂性排尿功能障碍。>结论:腹腔镜或开放式Lich-Gregoir技术矫正VUR对单侧和双侧VUR有效,效果相似。腹腔镜手术显着减少了术后止痛药,住院时间(每个项目中的p <0.05),并允许更快地恢复正常活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号