首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Public Health >Using Point-of-Choice Prompts to Reduce Sedentary Behavior in Sit-Stand Workstation Users
【2h】

Using Point-of-Choice Prompts to Reduce Sedentary Behavior in Sit-Stand Workstation Users

机译:使用即时选择提示来减少站立式工作站用户的久坐行为

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Introduction: Desk-based office workers are at occupational risk for poor health outcomes from excessive time spent sitting. Sit-stand workstations are used to mitigate sitting, but lack of workstation usage has been observed. Point-of-choice (PoC) prompts offer a complementary strategy for office workers to break up their sitting time.>Study purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the preliminary efficacy, preference, and acceptability of a theory-driven (i.e., 40 unique prompts encompassing social cognitive theory; TD-PoC) and an atheoretical basic reminder PoC prompt intervention (R-PoC) on reducing sedentary behavior in office workers with self-reported low sit-stand workstation usage (≤4 h per day).>Methods: In a cross-over design, participants (N = 19, 78.9% female, 39.4 ± 10.7 years of age) completed a 5-days no-prompt control condition followed by a random and counterbalanced assignment to one of the TD-PoC and R-PoC active conditions with a 1-week washout period between. Preliminary efficacy was assessed during work hours with the activPAL micro accelerometer. Preference was assessed prior to each active condition and acceptability was assessed following each active condition via questionnaire.>Results: The R-PoC prompt condition significantly decreased sitting time (b[se] = −49.0 [20.8], p = 0.03) and increased standing time (b[se] = 49.8 [19.7], p = 0.02) and displayed a significant increase in sit-stand transitions (b[se] = 2.3 [1.1], p = 0.04), relative to no-prompt control. Both the R-PoC and TD-PoC prompt conditions significantly decreased time spent in prolonged sitting bouts at b[se] = −68.1 [27.8], (p = 0.02), (b[se] = −76.7 [27.1], p = 0.008) relative to no-prompt control. Overall, the TD-PoC prompt condition displayed higher preference and acceptability ratings; however, these differences were not significant (p's > 0.05).>Conclusion: While the R-PoC prompt condition was slightly more efficacious than the TD-PoC prompt condition, the TD-PoC prompt condition was rated with higher preference and acceptability scores. Large variations between participants in preference, acceptability, and intervention feedback may indicate need for tailored messaging which may facilitate sustained use in the long-term.
机译:>简介:由于长时间坐在办公桌上,上班族面临健康状况不佳的职业风险。坐站式工作站用于减轻坐姿,但已发现工作站使用率不足。选择点(PoC)提示为上班族提供了一种补充策略,以延长他们的就座时间。>研究目的:本研究的目的是检查初次上班者的初步疗效,偏好和可接受性一种理论驱动的(即40项包含社会认知理论的独特提示; TD-PoC)和一种理论上的基本提示PoC提示干预(R-PoC),以减少自我报告的低坐姿工作站使用率的上班族久坐行为(每天≤4小时)。>方法:在交叉设计中,参与者(N = 19,女性78.9%,39.4±10.7岁)完成了5天无提示控制条件然后随机分配一个TD-PoC和R-PoC活跃状态中的一个,并进行平衡,间隔为1周。在工作时间内使用activPAL微型加速度计评估了初步疗效。 >结果:R-PoC即时状况显着减少了就坐时间(b [se] = -49.0 [20.8], p = 0.03)和增加的站立时间(b [se] = 49.8 [19.7],p = 0.02),并且坐姿-站立姿势的转换显着增加(b [se] = 2.3 [1.1],p = 0.04)无提示控制。 R-PoC和TD-PoC即时条件都显着减少了长时间坐位的花费时间,b [se] = -68.1 [27.8],(p = 0.02),(b [se] = -76.7 [27.1],p = 0.008)相对于无提示控制。总体而言,TD-PoC提示条件显示出更高的优先级和可接受性等级。但是,这些差异并不显着(p> 0.05)。>结论:尽管R-PoC提示条件比TD-PoC提示条件稍微有效,但TD-PoC提示条件的等级为较高的偏好和可接受性分数。参与者在偏好,可接受性和干预反馈方面的巨大差异可能表明需要量身定制的消息传递,这可能有助于长期持续使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号