首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Public Health >Media Agenda Setting Regarding Gun Violence before and after a Mass Shooting
【2h】

Media Agenda Setting Regarding Gun Violence before and after a Mass Shooting

机译:有关大规模射击前后枪支暴力的媒体议程设置

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Gun violence is related to substantial morbidity and mortality with surrounding discussions framed and shaped by the media. This study’s objective was to explore national news media’s reporting of gun violence around a mass shooting. National news pieces were coded according to categories of gun violence, media frames, entities held responsible, responses, and reporting of the public heath approach. Individuals were held responsible for gun violence in 63% of pieces before and 32% after the shooting. Lawmakers were held responsible in 30% of pieces before and 66% after. Background checks were a proposed gun violence prevention method in 18% of pieces before and 55% after Sandy Hook, and lethality reduction of firearms was in 9% before and 57% after. Following a mass shooting, the media tended to hold government, not individuals, primarily responsible. The media often misrepresented the real picture of gun violence and key public health roles.
机译:枪支暴力与大量发病率和死亡率相关,媒体围绕并围绕这些讨论展开讨论。这项研究的目的是探讨全国新闻媒体关于大规模枪击事件中枪支暴力的报道。国家新闻根据枪支暴力类别,媒体框架,负有责任的实体,回应和公共卫生方法的报道进行编码。在枪击前和枪击后,个人对枪支暴力负有责任的比例为63%。立法者在事前和事后分别承担30%和66%的责任。建议使用背景调查来预防枪支暴力,方法是在Sandy Hook之前的18%和之后的55%,枪支的致死率在之前和之后分别降低9%和57%。大规模枪击事件发生后,媒体倾向于让政府而非个人承担主要责任。媒体经常歪曲枪支暴力和关键公共卫生角色的真实情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号