首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Veterinary Science >No Clear Effect of Initiating Vaccination against Common Endemic Infections on the Amounts of Prescribed Antimicrobials for Danish Weaner and Finishing Pigs during 2007–2013
【2h】

No Clear Effect of Initiating Vaccination against Common Endemic Infections on the Amounts of Prescribed Antimicrobials for Danish Weaner and Finishing Pigs during 2007–2013

机译:在2007-2013年期间针对常见的地方性感染进行疫苗接种对丹麦断奶和育肥猪的处方抗菌药物的量没有明显影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

It is often stated that vaccines may help reduce antimicrobial use in swine production. However, limited evidence is available outside clinical trials. We studied the change in amounts of antimicrobials prescribed for weaners and finishers in herds following initiation of vaccination against five common endemic infections: Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, porcine circovirus type II, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, and Lawsonia intracellularis. Comparison was made to the change after a randomly selected date in herds not vaccinating against each of the infections. Danish sow herds initiating vaccination during 2007–2013 were included (69–334 herds, depending on the analysis). Danish sow herds with no use of the vaccine in question were included as non-exposed herds (130–570 herds, depending on the analysis). Antimicrobial prescriptions for weaners in sow herds and for finishers in receiving herds were extracted from the VetStat database for a period of 12 months before and 6–18 months after the first purchase of vaccine, or random date and quantified as average animal daily doses (ADDs) per 100 animals per day. The herd-level difference between ADD in the period after and before vaccination was the outcome in linear regression models for weaner pigs, and linear mixed-effects models for finishing pigs, taking into account sow herds delivering pigs to two or more finisher herds. Three plausible risk factors (Baseline ADD, purchase of specific vaccine, purchase of other vaccines) and five confounders (herd size, export and herd health status, year and season) were initially considered in all 10 models. The main significant effect in all models was the Baseline ADD; the higher the Baseline ADD was for weaner and finishing pigs, the larger the decrease in ADD was following vaccination (or random date for non-vaccinating herds). Regardless of vaccination status, almost equal proportions of herds experienced a decrease and an increase in ADD resulting in no overall Change in ADD. Furthermore, only minor effects were found, when vaccinations were used in combination. In conclusion, this study provided little support for the hypothesis that vaccination against five common endemic diseases provides a plausible general strategy to reduce antimicrobial use in Danish pig herds.
机译:人们常说疫苗可以帮助减少猪生产中的抗菌药物使用。但是,在临床试验之外尚无足够的证据。我们研究了针对五个常见的地方性感染的疫苗接种后,针对畜群中的断奶仔猪和育肥牛处方的抗菌药物数量的变化:猪肺炎支原体,胸膜肺炎放线杆菌,II型猪圆环病毒,猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒和细胞内劳森菌。比较随机选择的日期后未针对每种感染接种疫苗的牛群的变化。其中包括2007–2013年间开始接种疫苗的丹麦母猪群(69–334个母猪群,具体取决于分析)。未使用相关疫苗的丹麦母猪群作为未暴露的牛群(130-570牛群,取决于分析)。从VetStat数据库中提取初次接种疫苗之前12个月的时间和首次购买疫苗后6-18个月的时间(或随机日期)的母猪断奶仔猪和接收牛的育肥猪的抗菌处方,或随机日期,并量化为动物平均日剂量(ADDs) ),每天每100只动物)。断奶仔猪的线性回归模型和育肥猪的线性混合效应模型的结果是接种疫苗前后的ADD之间的畜群水平差异,其中考虑了将母猪分给两个或更多育肥猪的母猪。在所有10个模型中,最初考虑了三个合理的风险因素(基准ADD,购买特定疫苗,购买其他疫苗)和五个混杂因素(畜群大小,出口和畜群健康状况,年份和季节)。在所有模型中,主要的重大影响是基准ADD;断奶和育肥猪的基准ADD越高,接种疫苗(或未接种疫苗的牛群的随机日期)后,ADD的下降幅度越大。不论疫苗接种状况如何,几乎相等比例的牛群的ADD减少和增加都不会导致ADD的总体变化。此外,当联合使用疫苗时,发现的影响很小。总之,这项研究几乎没有为以下假说提供支持:针对五种常见地方病的疫苗接种为减少丹麦猪群的抗菌药物使用提供了合理的总体策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号