首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Veterinary Science >Behavioral Differences of Laying Hens with Fractured Keel Bones within Furnished Cages
【2h】

Behavioral Differences of Laying Hens with Fractured Keel Bones within Furnished Cages

机译:带家具的笼中产蛋鸡骨折龙骨的行为差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

High prevalence of keel bone fractures in laying hens is reported in all housing systems. Keel fractures have been associated with pain and restricted mobility in hens in loose housing. The objective was to determine whether keel fractures were associated with activity of hens in furnished cages. Thirty-six pairs of LSL-Lite hens (72 weeks) were enrolled in the study. One hen with a fractured keel and one hen without were identified by palpation in each of 36 groups of hens housed in either 30- or 60-bird cages stocked at 750 cm2/hen. Behavioral activity of each hen was recorded by four observers blind to keel status using focal animal sampling for 10 min within a 2-h period in the morning (08:00–10:00), afternoon (12:00–14:00), and evening (17:00–19:00). All hens were observed during each of the three sample periods for 3 days totaling 90 min, and individual hen data were summed for analysis. Hens were euthanized 48 h after final observations, dissected, and classified by keel status: F0 (no fracture, N = 24), F1 (single fracture, N = 17), and F2 (multiple fractures, N = 31). The percentages of time hens performed each behavior were analyzed using a mixed procedure in SAS with fracture severity, body weight, cage size, rearing environment, and tier in the model. Fracture severity affected the duration of perching (P = 0.04) and standing (P = 0.001), bout length of standing (P < 0.0001), and location (floor vs. perch) of resting behaviors (P = 0.01). F2 hens perched longer than F0 hens, 20.0 ± 2.9 and 11.6 ± 3.2%. F2 hens spent less time standing, 15.2 ± 1.5%, than F0 and F1 hens, 20.7 ± 1.6 and 21.6 ± 1.8%. F2 hens had shorter standing bouts (22.0 ± 4.2 s) than both F0 and F1 hens, 33.1 ± 4.3 and 27.4 ± 4.4 s. Non-fractured hens spent 80.0 ± 6.9% of total resting time on the floor, whereas F1 and F2 hens spent 56.9 ± 12.4 and 51.5 ± 7.7% resting on the floor. Behavioral differences reported here provide insight into possible causes of keel damage, or alternatively, indicate a coping strategy used to offset pain or restricted mobility caused by keel fractures.
机译:据报道,在所有鸡舍系统中,产蛋鸡龙骨骨折的患病率很高。龙骨骨折与松散的母鸡的疼痛和活动受限有关。目的是确定龙骨骨折是否与家具笼中的母鸡活动有关。该研究纳入了36对LSL-Lite母鸡(72周)。通过触诊,以每只750 cm 2 /只母鸡的30只或60只鸟笼中的36只母鸡中的每只,触诊鉴定出1只母鸡骨折。在早晨(08:00-10:00),下午(12:00-14:00)的2小时内,采用局灶性动物采样10分钟,记录了每只母鸡的行为活动,这些观察者不了解龙骨状态。以及晚上(17:00–19:00)。在三个采样期间中的每个采样期内,观察所有母鸡3天,总计90分钟,并汇总单个母鸡数据进行分析。最终观察后48小时对母鸡实施安乐死,将其解剖并按龙骨状态分类:F0(无骨折,N = 24),F1(单骨折,N = 17)和F2(多处骨折,N = 31)。在SAS中使用混合程序分析母鸡执行每种行为的时间百分比,其中包括骨折严重程度,体重,笼尺寸,饲养环境和模型层级。骨折的严重程度会影响其持续时间(P = 0.04)和站立时间(P = 0.001),站立时长(P <0.0001)以及休息行为的位置(地板与鲈鱼)(P = 0.01)。 F2母鸡的雌性比F0母鸡长,分别为20.0%±2.9%和11.6%±3.2%。 F2母鸡的站立时间要短于F0和F1母鸡的站立时间15.2%±1.5%,分别为20.7%±1.6%和21.6%±1.8%。 F2母鸡的站立回合(22.0±±4.2 s)短于 F 0和 F 1母鸡,分别为33.1±4.3和27.4±4.4。未骨折的母鸡在地板上的总休息时间为80.0%±6.9%,而 F 1和 F 2的母鸡在地板上的总休息时间为56.9%±12.4和51.5%±7.7%。地板。此处报道的行为差异可以洞悉龙骨损坏的可能原因,或者可以指示一种应对策略,用于抵消龙骨骨折引起的疼痛或活动受限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号