首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>G3: GenesGenomesGenetics >Genomic Selection for Yield and Seed Composition Traits Within an Applied Soybean Breeding Program
【2h】

Genomic Selection for Yield and Seed Composition Traits Within an Applied Soybean Breeding Program

机译:应用大豆育种计划中产量和种子组成性状的基因组选择

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Genomic selection (GS) has become viable for selection of quantitative traits for which marker-assisted selection has often proven less effective. The potential of GS for soybean was characterized using 483 elite breeding lines, genotyped with BARCSoySNP6K iSelect BeadChips. Cross validation was performed using RR-BLUP and predictive abilities (rMP) of 0.81, 0.71, and 0.26 for protein, oil, and yield, were achieved at the largest tested training set size. Minimal differences were observed when comparing different marker densities and there appeared to be inflation in rMP due to population structure. For comparison purposes, two additional methods to predict breeding values for lines of four bi-parental populations within the GS dataset were tested. The first method predicted within each bi-parental population (WP method) and utilized a training set of full-sibs of the validation set. The second method utilized a training set of all remaining breeding lines except for full-sibs of the validation set to predict across populations (AP method). The AP method is more practical as the WP method would likely delay the breeding cycle and leverage smaller training sets. Averaging across populations for protein and oil content, rMP for the AP method (0.55, 0.30) approached rMP for the WP method (0.60, 0.52). Though comparable, rMP for yield was low for both AP and WP methods (0.12, 0.13). Based on increases in rMP as training sets increased and the effectiveness of WP vs. AP method, the AP method could potentially improve with larger training sets and increased relatedness between training and validation sets.
机译:基因组选择(GS)已成为可行的定量性状选择方法,而标记辅助选择通常不那么有效。 GS对大豆的潜力使用483个优良育种系进行了表征,这些育种系使用BARCSoySNP6K iSelect BeadChips基因分型。使用RR-BLUP进行交叉验证,在最大的测试训练集大小下,蛋白质,油脂和产量的预测能力(rMP)分别为0.81、0.71和0.26。比较不同的标记物密度时,观察到的差异很小,并且由于人口结构,rMP中似乎出现了膨胀。为了进行比较,测试了另外两种预测GS数据集中四个双亲种群的品系育种值的方法。第一种方法是在每个双亲群体中进行预测(WP方法),并使用验证集的全同胞训练集。第二种方法是利用除验证集的同胞以外的所有其余育种系的训练集来预测整个种群(AP方法)。 AP方法更为实用,因为WP方法可能会延迟繁殖周期并利用较小的训练集。平均人群的蛋白质和油含量,AP方法的rMP(0.55,0.30)接近WP方法的rMP(0.60,0.52)。尽管可以比较,但AP和WP方法的rMP收率都很低(0.12,0.13)。基于随着训练集的增加rMP的增加以及WP vs.AP方法的有效性,随着更大的训练集以及训练和验证集之间相关性的增加,AP方法可能会得到改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号