首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>G3: GenesGenomesGenetics >Genomic-Enabled Prediction in Maize Using Kernel Models with Genotype × Environment Interaction
【2h】

Genomic-Enabled Prediction in Maize Using Kernel Models with Genotype × Environment Interaction

机译:利用基因型×环境相互作用的核模型在玉米中进行基因组预测

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Multi-environment trials are routinely conducted in plant breeding to select candidates for the next selection cycle. In this study, we compare the prediction accuracy of four developed genomic-enabled prediction models: (1) single-environment, main genotypic effect model (SM); (2) multi-environment, main genotypic effects model (MM); (3) multi-environment, single variance G×E deviation model (MDs); and (4) multi-environment, environment-specific variance G×E deviation model (MDe). Each of these four models were fitted using two kernel methods: a linear kernel Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor, GBLUP (GB), and a nonlinear kernel Gaussian kernel (GK). The eight model-method combinations were applied to two extensive Brazilian maize data sets (HEL and USP data sets), having different numbers of maize hybrids evaluated in different environments for grain yield (GY), plant height (PH), and ear height (EH). Results show that the MDe and the MDs models fitted with the Gaussian kernel (MDe-GK, and MDs-GK) had the highest prediction accuracy. For GY in the HEL data set, the increase in prediction accuracy of SM-GK over SM-GB ranged from 9 to 32%. For the MM, MDs, and MDe models, the increase in prediction accuracy of GK over GB ranged from 9 to 49%. For GY in the USP data set, the increase in prediction accuracy of SM-GK over SM-GB ranged from 0 to 7%. For the MM, MDs, and MDe models, the increase in prediction accuracy of GK over GB ranged from 34 to 70%. For traits PH and EH, gains in prediction accuracy of models with GK compared to models with GB were smaller than those achieved in GY. Also, these gains in prediction accuracy decreased when a more difficult prediction problem was studied.
机译:通常在植物育种中进行多环境试验,以选择下一个选择周期的候选对象。在这项研究中,我们比较了四个已开发的支持基因组的预测模型的预测准确性:(1)单环境,主要基因型效应模型(SM); (2)多环境主要基因型效应模型(MM); (3)多环境,单方差G×E偏差模型(MDs); (4)多环境,特定于环境的方差G×E偏差模型(MDe)。使用两种核方法对这四个模型分别进行拟合:线性核基因组最佳线性无偏预测器,GBLUP(GB)和非线性核高斯核(GK)。将这8种模型方法组合应用于两个广泛的巴西玉米数据集(HEL和USP数据集),在不同环境下评估了不同数量的玉米杂交种的谷物产量(GY),株高(PH)和穗高( EH)。结果表明,装有高斯核(MDe-GK和MDs-GK)的MDe和MDs模型具有最高的预测精度。对于HEL数据集中的GY,SM-GK的预测准确性相对于SM-GB的增加范围为9%至32%。对于MM,MD和MDe模型,GK的预测精度相对于GB的提高幅度为9%至49%。对于USP数据集中的GY,SM-GK的预测准确性相对于SM-GB的增加范围为0%至7%。对于MM,MD和MDe模型,GK的预测精度相对于GB的提高范围为34%至70%。对于性状PH和EH,与具有GB的模型相比,具有GK的模型的预测准确性的收益要小于GY的那些。同样,当研究更困难的预测问题时,预测准确性的这些增益也会降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号