首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Gastroenterology Research and Practice >Pros and Cons of the SeHCAT Test in Bile Acid Diarrhea: A More Appropriate Use of an Old Nuclear Medicine Technique
【2h】

Pros and Cons of the SeHCAT Test in Bile Acid Diarrhea: A More Appropriate Use of an Old Nuclear Medicine Technique

机译:SeHCAT测试在胆汁酸腹泻中的利与弊:旧核医学技术的更适当使用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Bile acid malabsorption (BAM) causing chronic diarrhea may be due to organic as well as functional disorders, and some of them were included under the general label of diarrheic-type irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D). The 75-selenium homocholic acid taurine (SeHCAT) test is a nuclear medicine investigation considered to be the gold standard for the diagnosis of bile acid malabsorption (BAM). Many studies demonstrate that it could be effective in the clinical workout of chronic diarrhea due to different conditions. The SeHCAT test provides a quantitative assessment to estimate the severity of BAM and the possible response to therapy with bile acid sequestrants (BASs). However, there is no general agreement regarding its cutoff value and the test is not widely available. The aim of this review is to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the SeHCAT test in clinical practice.
机译:引起慢性腹泻的胆汁酸吸收不良(BAM)可能是由于器质性疾病以及功能性疾病引起的,其中一些被归类为腹泻型肠易激综合症(IBS-D)的通用标签。 75硒高胆酸牛磺酸(SeHCAT)测试是核医学研究,被认为是诊断胆汁酸吸收不良(BAM)的金标准。许多研究表明,由于条件不同,它在临床慢性腹泻锻炼中可能是有效的。 SeHCAT测试提供了定量评估,以评估BAM的严重程度以及胆汁酸螯合剂(BAS)对治疗的可能反应。但是,关于其截止值尚无普遍共识,并且该测试也不广泛可用。这篇综述的目的是讨论SeHCAT测试在临床实践中的优缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号