首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Medical History >Matters of Priority: Herbert Mayo Charles Bell and Discoveries in theNervous System
【2h】

Matters of Priority: Herbert Mayo Charles Bell and Discoveries in theNervous System

机译:优先事项:赫伯特·梅奥查尔斯·贝尔和发现神经系统

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Between 1822 and the late 1830s a highly personal priority dispute was fought between the celebrated surgeon and anatomist Sir Charles Bell and his ex-student Herbert Mayo. The dispute was over the motor and sensory functions of the Vth and VIIth cranial nerves. Over the course of the 1820s and the 1830s, the competing claims of Bell and Mayo were presented in newspapers, journals, and textbooks. But by the time of Bell’s death in 1842, Mayo had been discredited, a seemingly tragic footnote in the history of nervous discovery. And yet, with the benefit of hindsight, Bell’s case was at best disingenuous. His success was not due to any intrinsic scientific merit in his argument, but rather his ability to create a narrative that undermined the credibility of Mayo. However, only when Mayo’s public performances elided with Bell’s descriptions did this ploy succeed. As a result, the dispute illuminates the importance of credibility to the creation of an idealised scientific medical practitioner.
机译:在1822年至1830年代后期,著名的外科医生和解剖学家查尔斯·贝尔爵士与他的前任学生赫伯特·梅奥之间发生了高度个人优先权的争执。争论是关于第V和第VII颅神经的运动和感觉功能。在1820年代和1830年代,贝尔和梅奥的竞争主张在报纸,期刊和教科书中都有提到。但是在贝尔1842年去世时,梅奥已经被抹黑了,这在神经发现的历史上似乎是悲惨的脚注。然而,借助事后的见解,贝尔的案件充其量是不明智的。他的成功并非归因于他的论点具有任何内在的科学价值,而是他创造叙事的能力削弱了梅奥的信誉。但是,只有在梅奥(Mayo)的公开表演不符合贝尔的描述时,这种策略才能成功。结果,争端阐明了建立理想的科学医学从业者的信誉的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号