首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Medical History >‘A Most Protean Disease’: Aligning Medical Knowledge of Modern Influenza 1890–1914
【2h】

‘A Most Protean Disease’: Aligning Medical Knowledge of Modern Influenza 1890–1914

机译:最变态的疾病:结合现代流感的医学知识1890-1914年

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article reconstructs the process of defining influenza as an infectious disease in the contexts of British medicine between 1890 and 1914. It shows how professional agreement on its nature and identity involved aligning different forms of knowledge produced in the field (public health), in the clinic (metropolitan hospitals) and in the laboratory (bacteriology). Two factors were crucial to this process: increasing trust in bacteriology and the organisation of large-scale collective investigations into influenza by Britain’s central public authority, the Medical Department of the Local Government Board. These investigations integrated epidemiological, clinical and bacteriological evidence into a new definition of influenza as a specific infection, in which a germ – Bacillus influenzae – was determined as playing a necessary but not sufficient role in its aetiology, transmission and pathogenesis. In defining ‘modern influenza’, bacteriological concepts and techniques were adapted to and selectively incorporated into existing clinical, pathological and epidemiological approaches. Mutual alignment thus was crucial to its construction and, more generally, to shaping developing relationships between laboratory, clinical and public health medicine in turn-of-the-century Britain. While these relationships were marked by tension and conflict, they were also characterised by important patterns of convergence, in which the problems, interests and practices of public health professionals, clinicians and laboratory pathologists were made increasingly commensurable. Rather than retrospectively judge the late nineteenth-century definition of influenza as being based on the wrong microbe, this article argues for the need to examine how it was established through a particular alignment of medical knowledge, which then underpinned medical approaches to the disease up to and beyond the devastating 1918–19 pandemic.
机译:本文重构了1890年至1914年在英国医学中将流行性感冒定义为传染病的过程。它显示了就其性质和特性达成的专业协议如何使在该领域产生的不同形式的知识(公共卫生)一致。诊所(大城市医院)和实验室(细菌学)。有两个因素对该过程至关重要:增加对细菌学的信任以及英国中央公共机构地方政府委员会医疗部门组织的大规模流感集体调查。这些研究将流行病学,临床和细菌学证据整合到了流感这一特定感染的新定义中,其中一种细菌(流感杆菌)被确定在其病因,传播和发病机制中起着必要但不充分的作用。在定义“现代流感”时,将细菌学的概念和技术进行了调整,并选择性地纳入了现有的临床,病理学和流行病学方法。因此,相互对齐对于其构建至关重要,并且更广泛地来说,对于在世纪之交的英国塑造实验室,临床和公共卫生医学之间发展的关系至关重要。虽然这些关系的特点是紧张和冲突,但它们也具有重要的趋同模式,在这些模式中,公共卫生专业人员,临床医生和实验室病理学家的问题,兴趣和做法越来越可衡量。本文不是回顾性地将19世纪晚期的流感定义定义为基于错误的微生物,而是主张有必要通过特定医学知识的结合来检验其是如何建立的,然后将其作为该疾病的医学方法的基础以及毁灭性的1918-19年大流行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号