首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>GMS German Medical Science >National survey of evaluation practices and performance-guided resource allocation at German medical schools
【2h】

National survey of evaluation practices and performance-guided resource allocation at German medical schools

机译:对德国医学院校评估实践和以绩效为导向的资源分配进行的国家调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Little is known about evaluation practices as well as performance-oriented allocation of resources according to teaching quality at German medical schools. For this reason, the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany and the German Association of Medical Faculties aimed to analyse current practices at German medical schools.>Methods: Data were collected by a questionnaire which was sent to all medical schools in Germany.>Results: 30 medical schools with 33 undergraduate medical programs participated in the survey (response rate: 83%). The evaluation tools used at these schools mainly assessed structural and procedural aspects of teaching and were designed to obtain overall student ratings of teaching quality. Evaluation tools were quite heterogeneous across the sample, and some uncertainty remained with regard to the psychometric properties of these tools and whether they meet international quality standards. Various algorithms underlying resource allocation for teaching are being used, but most focus on quantity rather than quality of teaching. >Conclusion: A nationwide agreement on a generalizable definition of high-quality teaching is desirable. At the same time, reliable and valid tools measuring teaching quality need to be identified and/or created. This could be accomplished through a wider collaboration of medical schools and could represent an advancement for the allocation of resources for high-quality teaching.
机译:>背景:对评估实践以及根据德国医学院校教学质量进行绩效导向的资源分配知之甚少。因此,德国科学医学会协会和德国医学院系旨在分析德国医学院校的现行做法。>方法: >结果:有30所大学设有33个本科医学专业的医学院参加了调查(答复率为83%)。这些学校使用的评估工具主要评估教学的结构和程序方面,旨在获得学生对教学质量的总体评价。评估工具在整个样本中非常不同,并且关于这些工具的心理计量特性以及它们是否符合国际质量标准仍然存在一些不确定性。正在使用各种用于教学资源分配的算法,但大多数算法都侧重于数量而不是教学质量。 >结论:需要在全国范围内就高质量教学的一般定义达成一致。同时,需要确定和/或创建测量教学质量的可靠有效工具。这可以通过医学院的更广泛合作来实现,并且可以代表为高质量教学分配资源的进步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号