首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Gene Expression >Every enhancer works with every promoter for all the combinations tested: could new regulatory pathways evolve by enhancer shuffling?
【2h】

Every enhancer works with every promoter for all the combinations tested: could new regulatory pathways evolve by enhancer shuffling?

机译:对于所有测试的组合每种增强子都与每个启动子一起工作:增强子改组是否会发展出新的调控途径?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The promoters and enhancers of cell type-specific genes are often conserved in evolution, and hence one might expect that a given enhancer has evolved to work best with its own promoter. While this expectation may be realized in some cases, we have not found evidence for it. A total of 27 combinations of different promoters and enhancers were tested by transfection into cultured cells. We found that the relative efficiency of the enhancers is approximately the same, irrespective of the type of promoter used, i.e., there was no strong preference for any given enhancer/promoter combination. Notably, we do not see particularly strong transcription when the immunoglobulin kappa enhancer (or the immunoglobulin heavy chain enhancer) is used to activate a kappa gene promoter. We propose that a generally permissive enhancer/promoter interaction is of evolutionary benefit for higher eukaryotes: by enhancer shuffling, genes could be easily brought under a new type of inducibility/cell type specificity.
机译:细胞类型特异性基因的启动子和增强子在进化中通常是保守的,因此人们可能期望一种给定的增强子已经进化为与自己的启动子一起发挥最佳作用。尽管在某些情况下可以实现这种期望,但我们尚未找到证据。通过转染到培养的细胞中测试了总共27种不同启动子和增强子的组合。我们发现,无论使用哪种启动子,增强子的相对效率都大致相同,即,对于任何给定的增强子/启动子组合都没有强烈的偏好。值得注意的是,当使用免疫球蛋白κ增强子(或免疫球蛋白重链增强子)激活κ基因启动子时,我们看不到特别强的转录。我们提出,一般允许的增强子/启动子相互作用对高级真核生物具有进化上的益处:通过增强子改组,可以容易地将基因置于新的诱导型/细胞类型特异性下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号