首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>GMS Hygiene and Infection Control >A comparison of the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from two different types of papers
【2h】

A comparison of the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from two different types of papers

机译:两种不同类型论文对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的可回收比例的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Aim: Paper is used for various purposes in hospitals. Generally, there are two different types of paper, which are commonly used in our facility: wood-free paper, and paper containing wood. We compared the recoverable proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; ATCC 43300) from the surface of such papers. >Method: The papers were divided into two groups: Group 1: wood-free paper; Group 2: paper containing wood. The papers were contaminated in a standardized procedure with 0.1 mL of a 5×107 CFU MRSA/mL stock solution. >Results: The recoverable proportion of MRSA was higher in the wood-containing papers than in the papers without wood (P=0.043). >Conclusion: This study indicates that if paper is purchased for healthcare facilities it should not contain wood, but rather wood-free paper types should be considered.
机译:>目的:纸张在医院中用于各种目的。通常,我们的工厂通常使用两种不同类型的纸张:无木纸和含木纸。我们比较了从此类论文表面可回收的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA; ATCC 43300)的比例。 >方法:论文分为两组:第1组:无木材纸;第二组:含木纸。按照标准程序用0.1 mL的5×10 7 CFU MRSA / mL储液污染纸张。 >结果:含木纸中MRSA的可回收比例高于无木纸中(P = 0.043)。 >结论:该研究表明,如果为医疗机构购买纸张,则纸张不应包含木材,而应考虑使用无木材纸张类型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号