首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>GMS Journal for Medical Education >Critical appraisal of RCTs by 3rd year undergraduates after short courses in EBM compared to expert appraisal
【2h】

Critical appraisal of RCTs by 3rd year undergraduates after short courses in EBM compared to expert appraisal

机译:与专家评估相比三年制本科生对EBM短期课程进行的RCT批判性评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Introduction: An essential aim of courses in evidence-based medicine (EBM) is to improve the skills for reading and interpreting medical literature adequately. Regarding the conceptual framework, it is important to consider different educational levels.>Aim: Our primary aim was to investigate the applicability of different instruments for the assessment of methodological study quality by 3rd grade students after short courses in EBM. Our secondary outcomes were agreement with expert assessments and student’s knowledge and competences.>Methods: We conducted four short courses in EBM of 90 minutes each for health care management and medical students focused on critical appraisal of the literature. At the end, the students assessed five publications about randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using five different instruments; the results were compared to expert assessments.>Results: In total, 167 students participated in our EBM courses. Students’ assessments showed a non-systematic over- and underestimation of risk of bias compared to expert assessments with no clear direction. Agreement with expert assessments ranged between 66% to over 80%. Across RCTs, evidence was found that the choice of instrument had an impact on agreement rates between expert and student assessments (p=0.0158). Three RCTs showed an influence of the instrument on the agreement rate (p<0.05 each). >Discussion: Our results contrast sharply with those of many other comparable evaluations. Reasons may be a lack of students’ motivation due to the compulsory courses, and the comparison to a reference standard in addition to self-ratings causing objectivity.>Conclusion: Undergraduates should become familiar with the principles of EBM, including research methods, and the reading of scientific papers as soon as possible. For a deeper understanding, clinical experience seems to be an indispensable precondition. Based on our results, we would recommend an integration of lectures about EBM and critical appraisal at least twice during studies and with greater intensity shortly before graduation.
机译:>简介:循证医学(EBM)课程的基本目标是充分提高阅读和解释医学文献的技能。关于概念框架,重要的是要考虑不同的教育水平。>目的:我们的主要目的是调查在EBM短期课程结束后,三级学生评估方法学习质量的不同工具的适用性。我们的次要结果是与专家评估以及学生的知识和能力相一致。>方法:我们针对健康管理和医学生开设了四门为期90分钟的EBM短期课程,重点是对文献进行严格评估。最后,学生们使用五种不同的工具评估了五本有关随机对照试验(RCT)的出版物。将结果与专家评估进行比较。>结果:总共有167名学生参加了我们的EBM课程。与没有明确方向的专家评估相比,学生的评估显示偏向风险的非系统性高估和低估。与专家评估的协议介于66%至80%以上。在所有RCT中,有证据表明,工具的选择对专家评估与学生评估之间的协议率有影响(p = 0.0158)。三个RCT显示仪器对同意率的影响(每个p <0.05)。 >讨论::我们的结果与许多其他可比较的评估结果形成鲜明对比。必修课的原因可能是缺乏学生的动力,除了自我评价之外,还与参考标准进行比较导致客观性。>结论:大学生应该熟悉EBM的原理,包括研究方法,并尽快阅读科学论文。为了加深理解,临床经验似乎是必不可少的前提。根据我们的研究结果,我们建议在学习期间至少两次进行有关循证医学和批判性评估的讲座,并且在毕业前不久进行一次强度更高的讲座。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号