首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>GMS Journal for Medical Education >Visions and reality: the idea of competence-oriented assessment for German medical students is not yet realised in licensing examinations
【2h】

Visions and reality: the idea of competence-oriented assessment for German medical students is not yet realised in licensing examinations

机译:愿景与现实:在许可考试中尚未实现对德国医学生进行以能力为导向的评估的想法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: Competence orientation, often based on the CanMEDS model, has become an important goal for modern curricula in medical education. The National Competence Based Catalogue of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM) has been adopted in Germany. However, it is currently unknown whether the vision of competence orientation has also reached the licensing examination procedures.>Methods: Therefore, a prospective, descriptive, single-centre, exemplary study design was applied to evaluate 4051 questions/tasks (from 28 examiners at 7 two-day licensing oral-practical exams) for undergraduate medical students at the University of Ulm. The oral and practical questions/tasks as well as the real bedside assessment were assigned to specific competence roles (NKLM section I), categories (NKLM section II) and taxonomy levels of learning domains.>Results: Numerous questions/tasks were set per candidate (day 1/2: 70±24/86±19 questions) in the licensing oral-practical exam. Competence roles beyond the “medical expert” were scarcely considered. Furthermore, practical and communication skills at the bedside were hardly addressed (less than 3/15 min). Strikingly, there was a significant predominance of questions with a low-level taxonomy. >Conclusions: The data indicate a misalignment of competence-oriented frameworks and the “real world” licensing practical-oral medical exam, which needs improvement in both evaluation and education processes.
机译:>目标:通常以CanMEDS模型为基础的能力导向已成为医学教育现代课程的重要目标。德国已经采用了基于国家能力的本科医学教育学习目标目录(NKLM)。但是,目前尚不知道能力导向的愿景是否也达到了许可审查程序。>方法:因此,采用了前瞻性,描述性,单中心,示例性的研究设计来评估4051个问题/乌尔姆大学的医学专业学生的任务(来自7位为期两天的两天执照考试的28位检查员)。口头和实际问题/任务以及实际的床边评估均分配给特定的胜任角色(NKLM第I部分),类别(NKLM第II部分)和学习领域的分类标准。>结果: /任务是在许可口语练习考试中为每个候选人设置的(第1/2天:70±24/86±19个问题)。几乎没有考虑过“医学专家”以外的能力角色。此外,几乎没有解决床边的实践和沟通技巧(少于3/15分钟)。令人惊讶的是,低分类标准的问题占主导地位。 >结论:数据表明,以能力为导向的框架与“现实世界”许可的实践口语医学考试不一致,需要在评估和教育过程中进行改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号