首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Hand (New York N.Y.) >Update of the Quick DASH Questionnaire to Account for Modern Technology
【2h】

Update of the Quick DASH Questionnaire to Account for Modern Technology

机译:更新快速DASH问卷以说明现代技术

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Almost 2 decades have passed since the development of the items contained in the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, and during this time, daily tasks have changed to adapt to changes in technology. >Methods: A cohort of 108 patients completed demographic information, the Quick DASH (both standard and technologically updated versions), and 2 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-based computerized adaptive testing questionnaires: PROMIS pain interference and upper-extremity function. To create a technologically updated Quick DASH, we substituted 3 items from the standard Quick DASH questionnaire with 3 other items related to the use of technology: (1) Text or dial with your cell phone, (2) Type on a keyboard, and (3) Use a computer mouse. >Results: The technologically updated Quick DASH questionnaire had lower scores compared with the standard Quick DASH (37 vs. 33, respectively), but they had a large correlation and both had high internal consistency. The items “Text or dial with your cell phone” and “Use a computer mouse” in the updated Quick DASH questionnaire had the lowest scores. Except for affected side, the standard Quick DASH and updated Quick DASH were influenced by the same factors. PROMIS pain interference was the only independent variable affecting both questionnaire scores. >Conclusions: A technologically updated Quick DASH had no advantage over the standard Quick DASH.
机译:>背景:自从开发“手臂,肩膀和手的快速残障”(DASH)调查表中的项目以来,已经过去了近20年,在此期间,日常任务已发生变化以适应技术的变化。 >方法:一组108位患者完成了人口统计学信息,Quick DASH(标准版和技术更新版)以及2张基于患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)的计算机自适应测试问卷:PROMIS止痛和上肢功能。为了创建技术更新的Quick DASH,我们将标准Quick DASH调查表中的3项替换为与技术使用相关的其他3项:(1)用手机发送文字或拨号,(2)键入键盘,以及( 3)使用电脑鼠标。 >结果:技术更新后的Quick DASH问卷与标准Quick DASH相比得分较低(分别为37和33),但它们具有很大的相关性,并且内部一致性很高。更新后的Quick DASH调查表中的“使用手机发送文字或拨打电话”和“使用计算机鼠标”项目的得分最低。除了受影响的方面,标准的Quick DASH和更新的Quick DASH受相同因素的影响。 PROMIS疼痛干预是影响两个问卷评分的唯一独立变量。 >结论:技术更新的Quick DASH与标准Quick DASH相比没有任何优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号