首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Economics Review >Contracting with private providers for primary care services: evidence from urban China
【2h】

Contracting with private providers for primary care services: evidence from urban China

机译:与私人医疗服务提供者签约:来自中国城市的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Controversy surrounds the role of the private sector in health service delivery, including primary care and population health services. China’s recent health reforms call for non-discrimination against private providers and emphasize strengthening primary care, but formal contracting-out initiatives remain few, and the associated empirical evidence is very limited. This paper presents a case study of contracting with private providers for urban primary and preventive health services in Shandong Province, China. The case study draws on three primary sources of data: administrative records; a household survey of over 1600 community residents in Weifang and City Y; and a provider survey of over 1000 staff at community health stations (CHS) in both Weifang and City Y. We supplement the quantitative data with one-on-one, in-depth interviews with key informants, including local officials in charge of public health and government finance.We find significant differences in patient mix: Residents in the communities served by private community health stations are of lower socioeconomic status (more likely to be uninsured and to report poor health), compared to residents in communities served by a government-owned CHS. Analysis of a household survey of 1013 residents shows that they are more willing to do a routine health exam at their neighborhood CHS if they are of low socioeconomic status (as measured either by education or income). Government and private community health stations in Weifang did not statistically differ in their performance on contracted dimensions, after controlling for size and other CHS characteristics. In contrast, the comparison City Y had lower performance and a large gap between public and private providers. We discuss why these patterns arose and what policymakers and residents considered to be the main issues and concerns regarding primary care services.
机译:围绕私营部门在提供初级保健和人口保健服务等卫生服务中的作用,争议不断。中国最近的医疗改革要求不歧视私人医疗服务提供者,并强调加强初级保健,但是正式的外包计划仍然很少,相关的经验证据也非常有限。本文提出了与中国山东省与私人提供者签订城市基础和预防保健服务合同的案例研究。案例研究借鉴了三个主要的数据来源:行政记录;对潍坊和Y市1600多名社区居民的住户调查;并对潍坊市和Y市社区卫生站(CHS)的1000多名员工进行了提供者调查。我们通过与主要信息提供者,包括负责公共卫生的地方官员进行一对一的深入访谈,补充了定量数据。我们发现患者组合存在显着差异:与由政府服务的社区中的居民相比,由私人社区卫生所服务的社区中的居民的社会经济地位较低(更有可能没有医疗保险且报告的健康状况较差),拥有CHS。对1013名居民进行的家庭调查分析表明,如果他们的社会经济地位较低(以教育或收入衡量),他们将更愿意在其社区卫生服务中心进行例行健康检查。在控制了规模和其他CHS特征之后,潍坊市的政府和私营社区卫生站在合同规定的规模上的表现没有统计学差异。相反,比较城市Y的绩效较低,公共和私人提供商之间的差距很大。我们讨论了为什么会出现这些模式,以及决策者和居民认为哪些是主要医疗保健服务的主要问题和关注点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号