首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Economics Review >Estimation of the cost-effectiveness of apixaban versus vitamin K antagonists in the management of atrial fibrillation in Argentina
【2h】

Estimation of the cost-effectiveness of apixaban versus vitamin K antagonists in the management of atrial fibrillation in Argentina

机译:估计阿哌沙班与维生素K拮抗剂在阿根廷房颤管理中的成本效益

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Apixaban, a novel oral anticoagulant which has been approved for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, reduces both ischemic and haemorrhagic stroke and produces fewer bleedings than vitamin K antagonist warfarin. These clinical results lead to a decrease in health care resource utilization and, therefore, have a positive impact on health economics of atrial fibrillation. The cost-effectiveness of apixaban has been assessed in a variety of clinical settings and countries. However, data from emergent markets, as is the case of Argentina, are still scarce.We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of apixaban versus warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in patients suitable for oral anticoagulation in Argentina. A Markov-based model including both costs and effects were used to simulate a cohort of patients with NVAF. Local epidemiological, resource utilization and cost data were used and all inputs were validated by a Delphi Panel of local experts. We adopted the payer’s perspective with costs expressed in 2012 US Dollars.The study revealed that apixaban is cost-effective compared with warfarin using a willingness to pay threshold ranging from 1 to 3 per capita Gross Domestic Product (11558 – 34664 USD) with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 786.08 USD per QALY gained. The benefit is primarily a result of the reduction in stroke and bleeding events.The study demonstrates that apixaban is a cost-effective alternative to warfarin in Argentina.
机译:阿哌沙班(Apixaban)是一种新型口服抗凝剂,已被批准用于预防非瓣膜性房颤的中风和全身性栓塞,与维生素K拮抗剂华法林相比,它可减少缺血性和出血性中风,并减少出血。这些临床结果导致医疗资源的利用减少,因此,对房颤的健康经济学产生积极影响。阿哌沙班的成本效益已经在各种临床环境和国家进行了评估。但是,仍然缺乏来自阿根廷等新兴市场的数据。我们对阿根廷适合口服抗凝治疗的患者的非瓣膜性房颤(NVAF)进行了阿哌沙班和华法林的成本-效果分析。基于马尔可夫模型(包括成本和效果)被用于模拟一组NVAF患者。使用了当地的流行病学,资源利用和成本数据,并且所有输入均由当地专家的Delphi小组验证。我们采用付款人的观点,以2012年美元表示的成本。研究表明,阿哌沙班与华法林相比具有较高的成本效益,其愿意支付的门槛为人均国内生产总值(11558 – 34664美元),且递增每QALY获得的成本效益比为786.08美元。该益处主要是由于中风和出血事件的减少所致。研究表明,阿哌沙班是阿根廷华法林的经济有效替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号