首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran >Comparing minimally supervised home-based and closely supervised gym-based exercise programs in weight reduction and insulin resistance after bariatric surgery: A randomized clinical trial
【2h】

Comparing minimally supervised home-based and closely supervised gym-based exercise programs in weight reduction and insulin resistance after bariatric surgery: A randomized clinical trial

机译:对比减肥手术后在体重减轻和胰岛素抵抗方面受最低监管的家庭健身计划和受严格监管的体育锻炼计划:一项随机临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Effectiveness of various exercise protocols in weight reduction after bariatric surgery has not been sufficiently explored in the literature. Thus, in the present study, we aimed at comparing the effect of minimally supervised home-based and closely supervised gym-based exercise programs on weight reduction and insulin resistance after bariatric surgery. >Methods: Females undergoing gastric bypass surgery were invited to participate in an exercise program and were randomly allocated into 2 groups using a random number generator in Excel. They were either offered a minimally supervised home-based (MSHB) or closely supervised gym-based (CSGB) exercise program. The CSGB protocol constitutes 2 weekly training sessions under ACSM guidelines. In the MSHB protocol, the participants received a notebook containing a list of recommended aerobic and resistance exercises, a log to record their activity, and a schedule of follow-up phone calls and clinic visits. Both groups received a pedometer. We measured their weight, BMI, lipid profile, FBS, and insulin level at baseline and at 20 weeks after the exercises, the results of which were compared using t test or Mann-Whitney U test at the end of the study. All the processes were observed by 1 senior resident in sport medicine. >Results: A total of 80 patients were recruited who were all able to complete our study (MSHB= 38 and CSGB= 42). The baseline comparison revealed that the 2 groups were similar. The mean change (reduction) in BMI was slightly better in CSGB (8.61 95% CI 7.76–9.45) compared with the MSHB (5.18 95% CI 3.91–6.46); p< 0.01. However, the 2 groups did not have a statistically significantdifference in the amount of change in the other factors including FBS and Homa.ir.>Conclusion: As we expected a non-inferiority result, our results showed that both MSHB and CSGB exercise methods are somewhatequally effective in improving lipid profile and insulin resistance in the 2 groups, but a slightly better effect on BMI was observed inCSGB group. With considerably lower costs of minimally supervised home- based exercise programs, both methods should be consideredwhen there is lack of adequate funding.
机译:>背景:在减肥手术后减轻体重的各种锻炼方案的有效性尚未在文献中得到充分探讨。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在比较减肥手术后最低限度监督的家庭健身计划和严密监督的体育锻炼计划对减肥和胰岛素抵抗的影响。 >方法:邀请接受胃旁路手术的女性参加运动计划,并使用Excel中的随机数发生器将其随机分为2组。为他们提供了最低监管的家庭健身(MSHB)或严密监管的健身房健身(CSGB)锻炼计划。根据ACSM准则,CSGB协议构成每周两次的培训课程。在MSHB协议中,参与者收到了一个笔记本,其中包含建议的有氧运动和抵抗运动列表,记录其活动的日志以及后续电话和诊所就诊的时间表。两组均收到计步器。我们在基线和运动后20周测量了他们的体重,BMI,脂质分布,FBS和胰岛素水平,在研究结束时使用t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验比较了它们的结果。一名运动医学高级住院医师观察了所有过程。 >结果:总共招募了80位能够完成研究的患者(MSHB = 38,CSGB = 42)。基线比较显示,两组相似。与MSHB(5.18 95%CI 3.91–6.46)相比,CSGB(8.61 95%CI 7.76–9.45)中BMI的平均变化(降低)略好。 p <0.01。但是,这两组没有统计学意义其他因素(包括FBS和Homa.ir)变化量的差异。>结论:正如我们预期的那样,我们的结果表明,MSHB和CSGB锻炼方法在某种程度上都可以在改善两组的血脂和胰岛素抵抗方面同样有效,但在BMI中观察到对BMI的影响略好CSGB组。由于最低限度的家庭指导运动计划的成本较低,因此应考虑两种方法当缺乏足够的资金时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号