首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Research Policy and Systems >Who needs what from a national health research system:lessons from reforms to the English Department of Healths RD system
【2h】

Who needs what from a national health research system:lessons from reforms to the English Department of Healths RD system

机译:谁需要国家卫生研究系统的服务:从改革到英国卫生部研发体系的经验教训

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Health research systems consist of diverse groups who have some role in health research, but the boundaries around such a system are not clear-cut. To explore what various stakeholders need we reviewed the literature including that on the history of English health R&D reforms, and we also applied some relevant conceptual frameworks.We first describe the needs and capabilities of the main groups of stakeholders in health research systems, and explain key features of policymaking systems within which these stakeholders operate in the UK. The five groups are policymakers (and health care managers), health professionals, patients and the general public, industry, and researchers. As individuals and as organisations they have a range of needs from the health research system, but should also develop specific capabilities in order to contribute effectively to the system and benefit from it.Second, we discuss key phases of reform in the development of the English health research system over four decades - especially that of the English Department of Health's R&D system - and identify how far legitimate demands of key stakeholder interests were addressed.Third, in drawing lessons we highlight points emerging from contemporary reports, but also attempt to identify issues through application of relevant conceptual frameworks. The main lessons are: the importance of comprehensively addressing the diverse needs of various interacting institutions and stakeholders; the desirability of developing facilitating mechanisms at interfaces between the health research system and its various stakeholders; and the importance of additional money in being able to expand the scope of the health research system whilst maintaining support for basic science.We conclude that the latest health R&D strategy in England builds on recent progress and tackles acknowledged weaknesses. The strategy goes a considerable way to identifying and more effectively meeting the needs of key groups such as medical academics, patients and industry, and has been remarkably successful in increasing the funding for health research. There are still areas that might benefit from further recognition and resourcing, but the lessons identified, and progress made by the reforms are relevant for the design and coordination of national health research systems beyond England.
机译:健康研究系统由在健康研究中具有一定作用的不同群体组成,但是围绕该系统的界限并不明确。为了探索各种利益相关者的需求,我们回顾了包括英国卫生研发改革历史在内的文献,并应用了一些相关的概念框架。我们首先描述了健康研究系统中主要利益相关者群体的需求和能力,并进行了解释这些利益相关者在英国运作的决策系统的主要特征。这五个小组分别是决策者(和卫生保健管理者),卫生专业人员,患者以及公众,行业和研究人员。作为个人和组织,他们对健康研究系统有多种需求,但也应开发特定功能,以便对系统进行有效贡献并从中受益。其次,我们讨论了英语开发中的关键改革阶段。四个世纪以来的健康研究系统-特别是英国卫生部的R&D系统-确定主要利益相关者利益的合理要求得到了解决通过应用相关的概念框架。主要的经验教训是:全面解决各种相互作用的机构和利益相关者的多样化需求的重要性;希望在卫生研究系统及其各个利益相关者之间的接口上发展促进机制;结论是,英国最新的卫生研发策略建立在最新进展的基础上,并解决了公认的弱点。该策略是一种确定和更有效地满足关键群体(例如医学学者,患者和行业)需求的重要途径,并且在增加健康研究的资金方面取得了显著成功。仍然有一些领域可以从进一步的认可和资源配置中受益,但是从中汲取的教训和改革取得的进展与英格兰以外的国家卫生研究系统的设计和协调有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号