首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Services Research >The production of dialysis by for-profit versus not-for-profit freestanding renal dialysis facilities.
【2h】

The production of dialysis by for-profit versus not-for-profit freestanding renal dialysis facilities.

机译:通过营利性与非营利性独立式肾脏透析设施进行透析生产。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE. A study was conducted to determine whether for-profit and not-for-profit freestanding renal dialysis facilities differ with respect to efficiency in the production of dialysis treatments. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING. National data on 1,224 Medicare-certified freestanding dialysis facilities were obtained from the Health Care Financing Administration's (HCFA) 1990 Independent Renal Dialysis Facility Cost Report. Data on Medicare patients receiving care at these facilities during 1990 were obtained from HCFA's End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Program Management and Medical Information System (PMMIS). STUDY DESIGN. Ordinary least squares regression (OLS) was used to estimate the association between monthly output of dialysis treatments in 1990 and (a) facility capital and labor inputs, (b) facility ownership characteristics, and (c) case-mix characteristics. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS. Facility and patient level data were extracted from the Facility Cost Report and the PMMIS databases, respectively. Patient level data were aggregated by facility and merged with facility level data. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS. For-profit sole proprietorships, for-profit partnerships and for-profit corporations each produced significantly more dialysis treatments per month than not-for-profits, adjusting for quantities of resource inputs and case-mix characteristics. CONCLUSION. For-profit facilities appear to be more efficient producers of dialysis treatments than not-for-profits. Further study should address whether other factors such as differences in severity of disease or in quality of care are responsible for these observations.
机译:目的。进行了一项研究,以确定营利性和非营利性独立式肾透析设施在生产透析治疗的效率方面是否有所不同。数据源/研究设置。从美国医疗保健融资管理局(HCFA)的1990年独立肾脏透析设施成本报告中获得了有关1,224份Medicare认证的独立透析设施的国家数据。 1990年期间在这些机构接受护理的Medicare患者的数据来自HCFA的终末期肾脏疾病(ESRD)计划管理和医学信息系统(PMMIS)。学习规划。普通最小二乘回归(OLS)用于估计1990年透析治疗的月产量与(a)设施资本和劳动力投入,(b)设施所有权特征和(c)病例混合特征之间的关联。数据收集/提取方法。设施和患者水平数据分别从设施成本报告和PMMIS数据库中提取。患者级别数据按机构汇总,并与机构级别数据合并。主要发现。营利性独资企业,营利性合伙企业和营利性公司每个月都比非营利性组织产生更多的透析治疗,并根据资源投入的数量和病例组合特征进行了调整。结论。营利性机构似乎比非营利性机构更有效地进行透析治疗。进一步的研究应解决其他因素,如疾病严重程度或护理质量的差异是否对这些观察结果负责。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号