首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Promotion Perspectives >Experimental investigation of the effects of acute exercise on memory interference
【2h】

Experimental investigation of the effects of acute exercise on memory interference

机译:急性运动对记忆干扰影响的实验研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

>Background: Among other factors, including the decay theory, interfering stimuli (proactive and retroactive interference; PI and RI) may influence the encoding and consolidation of target information. Acute exercise can enhance episodic memory function, but no experiments have evaluated whether exercise can attenuate PI and RI effects on memory, which was the purpose of this experiment.>Methods: Twenty young adults were randomized (via computer program) into one of 6 experimental groups (N=120, n=20 per group), including 3 PI (G1, G2, and G3) and 3 RI groups (G4, G5, and G6). Those in G1 and G4 exercised prior to a 10-list AB/AC paradigm with interference; G2 and G5 did not exercise but had interference; and G3 and G6 were the control groups with no exercise and no interference.>Results: The mean (95% CI) number of correctly recalled word pairs across the 6 respective groups was 2.4 (1.2-3.5), 2.4 (1.3-3.5), 5.1 (3.9-6.3), 6.9 (5.7-8.0), 5.0 (4.2-5.8), and 6.1 (5.1-6.9) (FANOVA=11.7; P<0.001; η2=0.33). For PI, the control group (group 3) correctly recalled more word pairs (5.1) when compared to the exercise interference group (2.4; group 1) or the non-exercise interference group (2.4; group 2). The difference between group 1 and 3 (2.4 vs.5.1) was significant (P=0.003), as was group 2 vs. 3 (P=0.002). For the RI groups (groups 4-6),group 4 differed from group 5 (6.9 vs. 5.0; P=0.01), but there was no difference between group 4 and group 6 (P=0.25) or group 5 and group 6 (P=0.09).>Conclusion: These preliminary findings suggest that acute exercise may be more beneficial for RI compared to PI, but additional experimental work is needed.
机译:>背景:除其他因素外,包括衰减理论,干扰刺激(主动和追溯干扰; PI和RI)可能会影响目标信息的编码和合并。急性运动可以增强发作性记忆功能,但尚无实验评估运动是否能减弱PI和RI对记忆的影响,这是本实验的目的。>方法:将20名年轻人随机分配(通过计算机程序) )分为6个实验组(每组N = 120,n = 20)之一,包括3个PI组(G1,G2和G3)和3个RI组(G4,G5和G6)。 G1和G4中的参与者在有干扰的10种AB / AC范式之前进行了锻炼; G2和G5没有运动,但有干扰; >结果:6个组中正确召回的单词对的平均数(95%CI)为2.4(1.2-3.5),而G3和G6为对照组。 2.4(1.3-3.5),5.1(3.9-6.3),6.9(5.7-8.0),5.0(4.2-5.8)和6.1(5.1-6.9)(FANOVA = 11.7; P <0.001;η2= 0.33)。对于PI,与运动干扰组(2.4;组1)或非运动干扰组(2.4;组2)相比,对照组(3组)正确地调出了更多的单词对(5.1)。第1组和第3组之间的差异(2.4 vs.5.1)显着(P = 0.003),第2组与3组之间的差异(P = 0.002)。对于RI组(第4-6组),第4组与第5组有所不同(6.9比5.0; P = 0.01),但第4组与第6组(P = 0.25)或第5组与第6组之间没有差异。 (P = 0.09)。>结论:这些初步发现表明,与PI相比,急性运动对RI可能更有益,但还需要其他实验工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号