首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Gut >Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosing ascites and predicting peritoneal metastases in gastric cancer patients
【2h】

Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosing ascites and predicting peritoneal metastases in gastric cancer patients

机译:内镜超声检查对胃癌患者腹水诊断及腹膜转移的准确性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Preoperative diagnosis of peritoneal metastases (PM) is difficult in patients with gastric cancer (GC).>Aims: To assess the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in diagnosing ascites and its predictability for the presence of PM in GC patients.>Subjects: Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed GC from 1998 to 2004 were studied.>Methods: All patients underwent EUS, ultrasound (US), and computed tomography (CT) scan for preoperative staging and the presence of ascites. The results were compared with operative findings. The diagnosis of PM was confirmed by histopathology or peritoneal fluid cytology.>Results: A total of 301 patients were recruited and in 250 patients the presence of ascites (n = 93) and PM (n = 71) were confirmed. EUS was more sensitive (87.1%) than combined US and CT scan examinations (16.1%) and operative findings (laparoscopy or laparotomy) (40.9%) in diagnosing ascites. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy for predicting the presence of PM were 73%, 84%, 64%, 89%, and 81% by EUS; 18%, 99%, 87%, 75%, and 76% by combining US and CT scan; and 77%, 94%, 83%, 91%, and 89% by operative findings, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, EUS detected ascites was the only significant independent predictor for the presence of PM (p<0.001; odds ratio 4.7 (95% confidence interval 2.0–11.2)).>Conclusion: EUS is a sensitive method for diagnosing ascites which is an important predictive factor for the presence of PM in GC patients.
机译:>背景:胃癌(GC)患者难以进行腹膜转移(PM)的术前诊断。>目的:评估内镜超声(EUS)在腹水诊断中的准确性>受试者:研究了1998年至2004年连续诊断为GC的连续患者。>方法:所有患者均接受了EUS,超声检查(美国)和计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描术前分期和腹水的存在。将结果与手术结果进行比较。通过组织病理学或腹膜液细胞学检查确诊为PM。确认。在诊断腹水方面,EUS比联合US和CT扫描检查(16.1%)和手术结果(腹腔镜或剖腹术)(40.9%)更敏感(87.1%)。 EUS的敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值以及预测PM存在的准确性分别为73%,84%,64%,89%和81%。通过US和CT扫描相结合,分别达到18%,99%,87%,75%和76%;手术结果分别为77%,94%,83%,91%和89%。在多元逻辑回归分析中,EUS检测到的腹水是存在PM的唯一重要独立预测因子(p <0.001;优势比4.7(95%置信区间2.0-11.2))。>结论:一种诊断腹水的敏感方法,这是GC患者中PM出现的重要预测因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号