首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Medical Devices (Auckland N.Z.) >Tissue response to applied loading using different designs of penile compression clamps
【2h】

Tissue response to applied loading using different designs of penile compression clamps

机译:使用不同设计的阴茎压紧钳对组织施加负荷的反应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Penile compression devices (PCD) or clamps are applied to compress the urethra and prevent urinary incontinence (UI). PCDs are more secure and less likely to leak than pads, allowing men the opportunity to participate in short-term, vigorous activities. However, they are uncomfortable, can cause pressure ulcers (PU) and affect penile blood flow. No objective assessment of tissue health has been undertaken to assess and compare different PCD designs and to provide guidance on safe use.>Objective: This study was designed to evaluate existing PCDs in terms of their physiological response and potential for pressure-induced injury.>Design, setting and participants: Six men with post-prostatectomy UI tested four selected PCDs at effective pressures, in a random order, in a controlled laboratory setting.>Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Using objective methods for assessing skin injury, PCDs were measured in situ for their effects on circulatory impedance, interface pressures and inflammatory response.>Results and limitations: There was evidence for PCD-induced circulatory impedance in most test conditions. Interface pressures varied considerably between both PCDs and participants, with a mean value of 137.4±69.7 mmHg. In some cases, penile skin was noted to be sensitive to loading with elevated concentration of the cytokine IL-1α after 10 mins wear, indicating an inflammatory response. IL-1α levels were restored to baseline 40 mins following PCD removal.>Conclusion: Skin health measures indicated tissue and blood flow compromise during the 50 mins of testing using all PCDs. Although there was an elevation in pro-inflammatory cytokines, PCDs did not cause sustained irritation and skin health measures recovered 40 mins after PCD removal. This research indicates that application of a clamp for one hour with an equal clamp free time before reapplication is likely to be safe. Longer periods are often recommended by manufacturers but have yet to be tested.
机译:>背景:使用阴茎压缩装置(PCD)或夹子来压缩尿道并预防尿失禁(UI)。 PCD比护垫更安全,更不会泄漏,使男人有机会参加短期的,有力的活动。但是,它们不舒服,会导致褥疮(PU)并影响阴茎血流。没有进行组织健康的客观评估以评估和比较不同的PCD设计并提供安全使用指导。 >设计,设置和参与者:六名前列腺切除术后UI的男性在有效压力下以受控的随机顺序在受控实验室环境中测试了四个选定的PCD。>结果测量和统计分析:使用客观的方法评估皮肤损伤,对PCD进行原位测量,以评估其对循环阻抗,界面压力和炎症反应的影响。>结果和局限性:有证据表明PCD-在大多数测试条件下会产生循环阻抗。 PCD和参与者之间的界面压力差异很大,平均值为137.4±69.7 mmHg。在某些情况下,穿戴10分钟后,阴茎皮肤对负荷量敏感,细胞因子IL-1α浓度升高,表明有炎症反应。去除PCD后40分钟,IL-1α水平恢复到基线水平。>结论:皮肤健康指标表明在使用所有PCD进行的50分钟测试中,组织和血流受到损害。尽管促炎性细胞因子升高,但PCD并未引起持续刺激,并且PCD去除后40分钟恢复了皮肤健康措施。这项研究表明,在重新涂抹之前,将一个钳夹应用一个小时,并在其上留出相等的空闲时间,这可能是安全的。制造商通常建议延长使用寿命,但尚未经过测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号