首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Gut >Evaluation of specific value of endoscopic biopsies and brush cytology for malignancies of the oesophagus and stomach.
【2h】

Evaluation of specific value of endoscopic biopsies and brush cytology for malignancies of the oesophagus and stomach.

机译:评估内窥镜活检和刷细胞学检查对食管和胃恶性肿瘤的具体价值。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The value of multiple biopsies and brush cytology at oesophago-gastroscopy was assessed in relation to macroscopy and localization on 100 verified tumours in a prospective study. The cumulative accuracy achieved was 96%. This was significantly better (P less than 0-01) than that of biopsy (83%) and of cytology (85%). While the reliability of both procedures was not significantly different in malignancies of the oesophagus, the gastric body, and the antrum, cytoloty was significantly more accurate in cancers of the cardia (90% and 55% respectively, P less than 0-05). Cytology was also more reliable in stenosing tumours (92%/72%,P less than 0-05). In polypoid malignancies a positive but not significant trend was found in favour of multiple biopsies (94%/64%). One of the two early cancers was only diagnosed by cytology. The results confirm the high diagnostic accuracy of multiple endoscopic biopsies combined with brush cytology and demonstrate the value of cytology in stenosing tumours, especially in those of the cardia.
机译:一项前瞻性研究评估了食管胃镜下多次活检和刷细胞学检查的价值,与宏观检查和定位在100个已验证的肿瘤上有关。达到的累计精度为96%。这比活检(83%)和细胞学检查(85%)好得多(P小于0-01)。尽管两种方法的可靠性在食道,胃体和胃窦的恶性肿瘤中均无显着差异,但在the门癌中,细胞色素的准确率明显更高(分别为90%和55%,P小于0-05)。细胞学检查在狭窄肿瘤中也更可靠(92%/ 72%,P小于0-05)。在息肉样恶性肿瘤中,发现积极但不显着的趋势是倾向于多次活检(94%/ 64%)。两种早期癌症之一仅通过细胞学诊断。结果证实了多种内窥镜活检结合刷式细胞学检查的高诊断准确性,并证明了细胞学检查在狭窄肿瘤中的价值,特别是在the门癌中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号