首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Acta Bio Medica : Atenei Parmensis >Investigation of the efficacy of generic and brand-name salmeterol/fluticasone combination in the management of asthma: a randomized comparative trial
【2h】

Investigation of the efficacy of generic and brand-name salmeterol/fluticasone combination in the management of asthma: a randomized comparative trial

机译:通用和品牌沙美特罗/氟替卡松联合治疗哮喘的疗效研究:一项随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Asthma is the most chronic inflammatory disease of the airways worldwide. Combination therapy with inhaled fluticasone and salmeterol is a common practice for the long-term management of asthma. Seretide® and Fluticort plus® are two available generic and brand name products of salmeterol/fluticasone. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these two drugs. Materials and Methods: In this randomized comparative, clinical trial, 80 asthmatic patients were allocated to Fluticort plus® (n=40) or Seretide® (n=40) for a period of 4 weeks. Patients with mild asthma were instructed to inhale one puff each 12 hours and those with moderate asthma two puffs every 12 hours. Respiratory volumes (assessed using spirometry), quality of life (assessed using St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ]) and control of asthmatic symptoms (assessed using asthma control test [ACT]) were evaluated at baseline and at the end of the study. Results: ACT score improved only in the Fluticort plus® group (p=0.012) while it was not significantly changed in the Seretide® group (p=0.178). In both treatment groups, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and total as well as subscale SGRQ scores were significantly improved by the end of the study (p<0.05). Seretide® more efficiently improved respiratory volumes and SGRQ score in comparison with Fluticort plus® (p<0.05). Conclusion: Our comparative trial indicated that generic fluticasone/salmeterol product could improve respiratory volumes, quality of life but its efficacy is lower than the brand-name product. However, Fluticort plus® improved asthma control more efficiently compared with Seretide®. ()
机译:背景:哮喘是全世界呼吸道最慢性的炎性疾病。吸入性氟替卡松和沙美特罗的联合治疗是哮喘长期治疗的一种常见做法。 Seretide®和Fluticortplus®是沙美特罗/氟替卡松的两种通用和商标产品。这项研究旨在比较这两种药物的疗效和安全性。材料和方法:在这项随机的比较性临床试验中,将80名哮喘患者分配为Fluticortplus®(n = 40)或Seretide®(n = 40),为期4周。指示轻度哮喘患者每12小时吸入一口气,中度哮喘患者每12小时吸入两口气。在基线和研究结束时评估了呼吸量(使用肺活量测定法评估),生活质量(使用圣乔治呼吸问卷调查[SGRQ]评估)和哮喘症状控制(使用哮喘控制测试[ACT]评估)。结果:ACT评分仅在Fluticortplus®组中有所改善(p = 0.012),而在Seretide®组中无显着变化(p = 0.178)。到研究结束时,两个治疗组的FEV1,FEV1 / FVC以及SGRQ总分及子量表得分均得到显着改善(p <0.05)。与Fluticortplus®相比,Seretide®更有效地改善了呼吸容量和SGRQ评分(p <0.05)。结论:我们的比较试验表明,通用的氟替卡松/沙美特罗产品可以改善呼吸容量,生活质量,但功效低于品牌产品。但是,与Seretide®相比,Fluticortplus®更有效地改善了哮喘的控制。 ()

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号