首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Insects >The Compared Efficiency of the Traditional Method Radiography without Contrast and Radiography with Contrast in the Determination of Infestation by Weevil (Sitophilus zeamais) in Maize Seeds
【2h】

The Compared Efficiency of the Traditional Method Radiography without Contrast and Radiography with Contrast in the Determination of Infestation by Weevil (Sitophilus zeamais) in Maize Seeds

机译:传统方法无对比射线照相和无对比射线照相法测定玉米种子中象鼻虫(Sitophilus zeamais)侵染的比较效率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Technologies that increase safety and efficiency, while facilitating and streamlining the work of seed analysts, are increasingly required by the seed industry. X-ray image analysis is a technique that has been used in the analysis of grain and seeds because it is fast, accurate and non-destructive. The traditional method to verify the presence of insect damage in seeds involves manual cutting of the seeds, which endangers the safety of the analyst and is time-consuming and repetitive work that leads to visual fatigue. The objective of this study was to compared the efficiency of radiographic analysis with and without contrast in the determination of infestation by Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), at different stages of development, in maize seeds, compared to the traditional method required by seed legislation, which consists of cutting and visual evaluation. Seeds were evaluated regarding the presence of eggs/oviposition signs, larvae, pupae, adult insects, insect damage in five infestation periods (5, 18, 33 and 35 days after infestation), while evaluating the total number of seeds infested, comparing the three methods. For characterization of the oviposition stage, the use of contrast was best at all times of infestation. For the larval stage, there was no difference between the evaluation methods; however, at 18 days, larger infestations were observed by the traditional method. At 5 days, the identification of pupae was better by the traditional method and radiography without contrast, while for the identification of adult insects the best method was the use of radiography without contrast. The characterization of the level of infestation with maize weevil damage was best verified using contrast radiography. Radiographic analysis is efficient in the detection of damage caused by S. zeamais in maize seeds. This method of radiographic analysis (with or without contrast) is thus an auxiliary tool to assess the damage and presence of S. zeamais in maize seeds.
机译:种子行业越来越需要在提高安全性和效率的同时,简化和简化种子分析人员工作的技术。 X射线图像分析是一种用于谷物和种子分析的技术,因为它快速,准确且无损。验证种子中是否存在昆虫损害的传统方法包括手动切割种子,这危及了分析人员的安全,并且是费时且重复的工作,导致视觉疲劳。这项研究的目的是比较玉米种子中处于不同发育阶段的玉米Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky(鞘翅目:Curculionidae)侵染确定中有无对比的射线照相分析的效率,这与种子所需的传统方法相比立法,包括切割和视觉评估。在五个侵染期(侵染后5、18、33和35天)评估种子的卵/产卵迹象,幼虫,p,成虫,昆虫危害,同时评估侵染的种子总数,比较三个方法。为了表征产卵阶段,在所有侵染时最好使用对比剂。在幼体阶段,评估方法之间没有差异。然而,在第18天,通过传统方法观察到较大的侵扰。在第5天时,通过传统方法和X射线照相法(无对比)可以更好地识别the,而对于鉴定成年昆虫,最好的方法是使用无对比射线照相法。使用对比射线照相可以最好地验证玉米象鼻虫侵害程度的特征。射线照相分析可有效地检测玉米种子中玉米赤霉菌引起的破坏。因此,这种射线照相分析方法(有或没有对比)是评估玉米种子中玉米赤霉菌的危害和存在的​​辅助工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号