首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Alzheimers Disease >Sensitivity of Nursing Home Cost Comparisons to Method of Dementia Diagnosis Ascertainment
【2h】

Sensitivity of Nursing Home Cost Comparisons to Method of Dementia Diagnosis Ascertainment

机译:护理院费用比较对痴呆症诊断确定方法的敏感性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study compared the association of differing methods of dementia ascertainment, derived from multiple sources, with nursing home (NH) estimates of prevalence of dementia, length of stay, and costs an understudied issue. Subjects were 2050 new admissions to 59 Maryland NHs, from 1992 to 1995 followed longitudinally for 2 years. Dementia was ascertained at admission from charts, Medicare claims, and expert panel. Overall 59.5% of the sample had some indicator of dementia. The expert panel found a higher prevalence of dementia (48.0%) than chart review (36.9%) or Medicare claims (38.6%). Dementia cases had lower relative average per patient monthly costs, but longer NH length of stay compared to nondementia cases across all methods. The prevalence of dementia varied widely by method of ascertainment, and there was only moderate agreement across methods. However, lower costs for dementia among NH admissions are a robust finding across these methods.
机译:这项研究比较了多种来源的痴呆症确定方法的不同与养老院(NH)对痴呆症患病率,住院时间和费用的估计之间的关系。受试者是1992年至1995年2050名新入学的马里兰州NHs,从纵向开始进行了2年。入院时从图表,Medicare索赔和专家小组中确定痴呆症。总体样本中59.5%有痴呆症指标。专家小组发现,痴呆症的患病率(48.0%)比图表审查(36.9%)或Medicare索赔(38.6%)高。与所有方法相比,非痴呆病例相比,痴呆病例每位患者每月的相对平均费用较低,但NH住院时间更长。痴呆的患病率因确定方法的不同而有很大差异,并且各方法之间只有中等程度的一致性。然而,在这些方法中,NH入院中痴呆症的成本较低是一个可靠的发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号