首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine >Comparison on the efficacy of everolimus-eluting stent and zotarolimus-eluting stents in coronary heart disease between diabetic and non-diabetic patients
【2h】

Comparison on the efficacy of everolimus-eluting stent and zotarolimus-eluting stents in coronary heart disease between diabetic and non-diabetic patients

机译:糖尿病和非糖尿病患者使用依维莫司洗脱支架和佐他莫司洗脱支架治疗冠心病的疗效比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: The aim of this study is to examine and compare the efficacy of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) and zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) in coronary heart disease in diabetic or non-diabetic patients. Methods: A total of 666 patients needed for percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly selected from June 2008 to June 2013 in our hospital and were divided into two groups: (i) coronary heart disease with diabetes group and (ii) non-diabetes group. Patients in each group were further assigned to receive treatment of either EES or ZES. Then we observed the major adverse cardiac events, including mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction and non-fatal cerebrovascular events over the period of 15 months after initial stent implantation. Results: Compared to the non-diabetic group, more patients in diabetic group had received anti-hypotensive treatment (72% vs. 49%, P < 0.0001) and hypolipemic treatment (80% vs. 67%, P < 0.0001) before the percutaneous coronary intervention. In both diabetic group and non-diabetic group, patients received ZES treatment had a much greater incidence rate of major adverse cardiac events compared to the patients received EES treatment (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, target lesion revascularization rate in the ZES group was also significantly higher than that in the EES group. The data showed big differences between ZES and EES groups with important statistical significance (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Patients with coronary heart disease and diabetes have a higher risk of major adverse cardiac events after stent implantation. EES treatment is safer with higher efficacy in our study, being a more effective stent for the patients merged with diabetes.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是检查和比较依维莫司洗脱支架(EES)和佐他莫司洗脱支架(ZES)在糖尿病或非糖尿病患者冠心病中的疗效。方法:自2008年6月至2013年6月在我院随机抽取666例经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者,分为两组:(i)糖尿病合并冠心病组和(ii)非糖尿病组。每组的患者均被进一步分配接受EES或ZES的治疗。然后,我们观察了在初始支架植入后15个月内的主要不良心脏事件,包括死亡率,非致命性心肌梗塞和非致命性脑血管事件。结果:与非糖尿病组相比,糖尿病组更多的患者在术前接受了降压治疗(72%vs. 49%,P <0.0001)和降血脂治疗(80%vs. 67%,P <0.0001)。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。在糖尿病组和非糖尿病组中,与接受EES治疗的患者相比,接受ZES治疗的患者的主要不良心脏事件的发生率要高得多(P <0.05)。同时,ZES组的靶病变血运重建率也明显高于EES组。数据显示ZES组和EES组之间存在较大差异,具有重要的统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论:冠心病和糖尿病患者在支架植入后发生重大不良心脏事件的风险更高。在我们的研究中,EES治疗更安全,疗效更高,是合并糖尿病患者的更有效支架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号