首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine >Longitudinal analysis of meta-analysis literatures in the database of ISI Web of Science
【2h】

Longitudinal analysis of meta-analysis literatures in the database of ISI Web of Science

机译:ISI Web of Science数据库中荟萃分析文献的纵向分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The meta-analysis is regarded as an important evidence for making scientific decision. The database of ISI Web of Science collected a great number of high quality literatures including meta-analysis literatures. However, it is significant to understand the general characteristics of meta-analysis literatures to outline the perspective of meta-analysis. In this present study, we summarized and clarified some features on these literatures in the database of ISI Web of Science. We retrieved the meta-analysis literatures in the database of ISI Web of Science including SCI-E, SSCI, A&HCI, CPCI-S, CPCI-SSH, CCR-E, and IC. The annual growth rate, literature category, language, funding, index citation, agencies and countries/territories of the meta-analysis literatures were analyzed, respectively. A total of 95,719 records, which account for 0.38% (99% CI: 0.38%-0.39%) of all literatures, were found in the database. From 1997 to 2012, the annual growth rate of meta-analysis literatures was 18.18%. The literatures involved in many categories, languages, fundings, citations, publication agencies, and countries/territories. Interestingly, the index citation frequencies of the meta-analysis were significantly higher than that of other type literatures such as multi-centre study, randomize controlled trial, cohort study, case control study, and cases report (P<0.0001). The increasing numbers, intensively global influence and high citations revealed that the meta-analysis has been becoming more and more prominent in recent years. In future, in order to promote the validity of meta-analysis, the CONSORT and PRISMA standard should be continuously popularized in the field of evidence-based medicine.
机译:荟萃分析被认为是做出科学决策的重要证据。 ISI Web of Science的数据库收集了大量高质量的文献,包括荟萃分析文献。但是,了解荟萃分析文献的一般特征以概述荟萃分析的观点非常重要。在本研究中,我们总结并阐明了ISI Web of Science数据库中这些文献的某些特征。我们在ISI Web of Science的数据库中检索了元分析文献,包括SCI-E,SSCI,A&HCI,CPCI-S,CPCI-SSH,CCR-E和IC。分别分析了荟萃分析文献的年增长率,文献类别,语言,经费,索引引文,机构和国家/地区。在数据库中总共找到了95,719条记录,占所有文献的0.38%(99%CI:0.38%-0.39%)。从1997年到2012年,荟萃分析文献的年增长率为18.18%。涉及许多类别,语言,经费,引文,出版机构和国家/地区的文献。有趣的是,荟萃分析的索引引用频率明显高于其他类型的文献,例如多中心研究,随机对照试验,队列研究,病例对照研究和病例报告(P <0.0001)。越来越多的数据,广泛的全球影响力和高引用率表明,荟萃分析近年来变得越来越重要。今后,为了提高荟萃分析的有效性,应在循证医学领域继续推广CONSORT和PRISMA标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号