首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Dentistry >Mechanical Properties of Elastomeric Impression Materials: An In Vitro Comparison
【2h】

Mechanical Properties of Elastomeric Impression Materials: An In Vitro Comparison

机译:弹性印象材料的机械性能:体外比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose. Although new elastomeric impression materials have been introduced into the market, there are still insufficient data about their mechanical features. The tensile properties of 17 hydrophilic impression materials with different consistencies were compared. Materials and Methods. 12 vinylpolysiloxane, 2 polyether, and 3 hybrid vinylpolyether silicone-based impression materials were tested. For each material, 10 dumbbell-shaped specimens were fabricated (n = 10), according to the ISO 37:2005 specifications, and loaded in tension until failure. Mean values for tensile strength, yield strength, strain at break, and strain at yield point were calculated. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests (α = 0.05). Results. Vinylpolysiloxanes consistently showed higher tensile strength values than polyethers. Heavy-body materials showed higher tensile strength than the light bodies from the same manufacturer. Among the light bodies, the highest yield strength was achieved by the hybrid vinylpolyether silicone (2.70 MPa). Polyethers showed the lowest tensile (1.44 MPa) and yield (0.94 MPa) strengths, regardless of the viscosity. Conclusion. The choice of an impression material should be based on the specific physical behavior of the elastomer. The light-body vinylpolyether silicone showed high tensile strength, yield strength, and adequate strain at yield/brake; those features might help to reduce tearing phenomena in the thin interproximal and crevicular areas.
机译:目的。尽管新的弹性体印模材料已投放市场,但有关其机械特性的数据仍然不足。比较了17种不同稠度的亲水印模材料的拉伸性能。材料和方法。测试了12种乙烯基聚硅氧烷,2种聚醚和3种杂化乙烯基聚醚有机硅基印模材料。对于每种材料,根据ISO 37:2005规格制造10个哑铃形试样(n = 10),并施加拉力直至失效。计算拉伸强度,屈服强度,断裂应变和屈服点应变的平均值。使用单向方差分析和Tukey检验(α= 0.05)对数据进行统计分析。结果。乙烯基聚硅氧烷始终显示出比聚醚更高的拉伸强度值。与同一制造商生产的轻型车身相比,重型车身材料显示出更高的拉伸强度。在轻体中,杂化乙烯基聚醚有机硅(2.70 MPa)实现了最高的屈服强度。无论粘度如何,聚醚均显示出最低的拉伸强度(1.44 yieldMPa)和屈服强度(0.94 MPa)。结论。压印材料的选择应基于弹性体的特定物理性能。轻质乙烯基聚醚有机硅显示出高的拉伸强度,屈服强度和屈服/制动时足够的应变。这些特征可能有助于减少薄的近端和小孔区域的撕裂现象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号