首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal for Equity in Health >Is the judicialization of health care bad for equity? A scoping review
【2h】

Is the judicialization of health care bad for equity? A scoping review

机译:医疗保健的司法化对公平不利吗?范围审查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe term “judicialization of health care” describes the use of rights-based litigation to demand access to pharmaceuticals and medical treatments. The judicialization of health care in Latin America has two defining features. Firstly, it has been conducted in an individualized fashion. Secondly, it is highly pharmaceuticalized, since most public expenditure related to health rights litigation is invested in paying for costly medications. Recent studies also suggest that the judicialization of health care is bad for equity since it skews limited health resources away from the poorest citizens and in favor of the more affluent.
机译:背景技术“医疗保健司法化”一词描述了使用基于权利的诉讼来要求获得药品和医疗服务。拉丁美洲医疗保健的司法化具有两个定义特征。首先,它是以个性化的方式进行的。其次,它是高度药品化的,因为与健康权诉讼相关的大多数公共支出都用于支付昂贵的药物。最近的研究还表明,医疗保健的司法化不利于公平,因为它使有限的医疗资源偏离了最贫穷的公民,而偏向较富裕的人群。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号