首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Conventional versus Digital Impressions for Full Arch Screw-Retained Maxillary Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial
【2h】

Conventional versus Digital Impressions for Full Arch Screw-Retained Maxillary Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial

机译:常规和数字印象的全牙弓螺钉固定上颌修复术:一项随机临床试验。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: The objective of this study was to compare conventional versus digital impressions for Full-Arch maxillary rehabilitations. Methods: Patients selected for this study were treated with full-arch screw-retained rehabilitations supported by six immediately loaded dental implants. Patients have been scheduled randomly into control (conventional impression group, CIG) and test (digital impression group, DIG) groups respectively for a fully conventional workflow and a fully digital workflow. In both groups, within 24 h, temporary prostheses were delivered. Four months after the implant positioning, the two groups dealt with the fabrication of definitive restorations: conventional pick-up was performed in the control group, and definitive digital impressions were carried out in the test group. The time involved following these two procedures was recorded. Patients underwent intraoral digital radiographs to evaluate the accuracy of the framework-implant connection, check for the presence of voids at the bar-implant connection and measure bone level. Criteria used to assess success at the prosthetic level were the occurrence of prosthetic maintenance, the absence of fractures of the acrylic resin superstructure and voids. Results: A total of 50 patients received immediately loaded prostheses supported by six implants (total 300 implants). A fixture and prosthetic survival rate of 100% was observed. All digital X-ray examinations revealed a bar-implant connection accuracy and no voids. Differences that were not statistically significant (p > 0.05) in marginal bone loss were found between control and test groups. Significantly less time was spent to perform digital impression procedure (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Clinical and radiological results of the test group advocate a satisfactory accuracy and predictability of the intraoral scanner (IOS) to be a reliable alternative in clinical practice for implant full-arch rehabilitations and suggest fabrication of definitive restorations with a successful marginal fit precision.
机译:背景:这项研究的目的是比较传统的和数字印象的全弓上颌骨康复。方法:选择参加本研究的患者,接受六颗即刻负载的种植牙支持的全牙弓螺钉固定康复治疗。已将患者随机分为对照组(常规印象组,CIG)和测试组(数字印象组,DIG),以进行完全常规的工作流程和完全数字化的工作流程。两组均在24小时内交付了临时假体。植入物放置四个月后,两个小组进行了最终修复体的制作:对照组中进行了常规修复,在测试组中进行了明确的数字化印模。记录了遵循这两个过程所需的时间。患者接受口内X光片检查以评估框架与植入物之间连接的准确性,检查棒状与植入物之间是否存在空隙并测量骨水平。在假肢水平上评估成功的标准是假肢维持的发生,丙烯酸树脂上部结构的破裂和空隙的缺失。结果:总共有50名患者接受了由6个植入物(总共300个植入物)支持的即刻加载的假体。固定装置和假体的存活率为100%。所有数字X射线检查均显示棒-植入物的连接精度,且无空隙。对照组和测试组之间的边缘骨丢失差异无统计学意义(p> 0.05)。花在执行数字印模程序上的时间明显更少(p <0.05)。结论:测试组的临床和放射学结果表明,口内扫描仪(IOS)具有令人满意的准确性和可预测性,可以在临床实践中替代植入物的全牙弓修复,并建议以成功的边缘拟合精度制造确定的修复体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号