首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Short Communication: Health Interventions in Volcanic Eruptions—Community Wearability Assessment of Respiratory Protection against Volcanic Ash from Mt Sinabung Indonesia
【2h】

Short Communication: Health Interventions in Volcanic Eruptions—Community Wearability Assessment of Respiratory Protection against Volcanic Ash from Mt Sinabung Indonesia

机译:简短交流:火山喷发中的健康干预措施—来自印度尼西亚锡纳蓬山的防火山灰呼吸防护的社区可穿戴性评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Inhalation of ash can be of great concern for affected communities, during and after volcanic eruptions. Governmental and humanitarian agencies recommend and distribute a variety of respiratory protection (RP), commonly surgical masks but, also, industry-certified N95-style masks. However, there is currently no evidence on how wearable they are within affected populations or how protective wearers perceive them being against volcanic ash (which will influence the likelihood of uptake of recommended interventions). Volunteers living near Mt. Sinabung, Sumatra, Indonesia, participated in a field wearability study, which included a high-efficiency mask certified to industry standards (N95-equiv.); a standard, pleated surgical mask (Surgical); a Basic flat-fold mask (Flat-fold), and the surgical mask plus a scarf tied over the top (Surgical Plus) to improve fit. These types of RP had all performed well during earlier laboratory filtration efficiency tests. The N95-equiv. mask had performed significantly better than the other RP in the subsequent total inward leakage volunteer trials, whilst the Flat-fold and Surgical masks performed poorly, letting in a third of PM2.5 particles (data published elsewhere). Thirty volunteers wore each mask for a 15-min walk before being asked to rate the comfort, breathability and perceived protection and fit of each. After wearing all of the masks, volunteers compared and identified their preferred type of protection. The feedback received from the volunteers suggested that the Surgical Plus and N95-equiv. masks were rated as being significantly hotter and more humid than other masks. The Flat-fold was rated to have better breathability than the other masks. The N95-equiv. mask was ranked as providing the best level of effectiveness of the four masks tested. Ultimately, when asked which type of mask they would choose to wear during ashfall, 33% selected the Flat-fold mask due to its comfort and simplicity, with the Surgical Plus being the least likely to be chosen of the four tested. The study findings are of benefit to agencies who need to make informed decisions on the procurement and distribution of RP for use by those affected in future eruptions and the provision of advice to communities on their usage.
机译:火山爆发期间和之后,吸入灰分可能会受到受影响社区的极大关注。政府和人道主义机构建议并分发各种呼吸防护(RP),通常是外科口罩,还有行业认证的N95型口罩。但是,目前尚无证据表明它们在受影响的人群中具有多大的可穿戴性,或者防护性穿戴者如何看待它们抵御火山灰(这将影响采用建议的干预措施的可能性)。住在富士山附近的志愿者印度尼西亚苏门答腊的Sinabung参加了现场可穿戴性研究,其中包括通过行业标准(N95认证)认证的高效面罩;标准的打褶手术口罩(Surgical);基本的折叠式口罩(Fold-fold),以及手术口罩和绑在顶部的围巾(Surgical Plus),以提高贴合度。在早期的实验室过滤效率测试中,这些类型的RP均表现良好。 N95等效设备。在随后的全部内向泄漏志愿者试验中,面罩的表现明显优于其他RP,而平口罩和手术口罩的表现较差,仅占三分之一的PM2.5颗粒(数据在其他地方发表)。 30名志愿者戴着每个口罩步行15分钟,然后要求他们对每种口罩的舒适性,透气性以及感知的保护性和适合性进行评估。戴好所有口罩后,志愿者进行比较并确定了他们偏爱的防护类型。从志愿者那里收到的反馈意见建议使用Surgical Plus和N95-equiv。口罩被认为比其他口罩更热,更湿。平折被认为具有比其他面罩更好的透气性。 N95等效设备。面膜被评为提供四种测试面膜最佳水平的效果。最终,当被问及在降落期间选择戴哪种口罩时,有33%的人选择平口罩是因为其舒适性和简便性,而Surgical Plus是四种测试中最少的选择。该研究结果有益于需要在RP的采购和分配上做出明智决定的机构,以供将来爆发的受影响者使用,并向社区提供使用建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号