首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Evaluation of a Digital Consultation and Self-Care Advice Tool in Primary Care: A Multi-Methods Study
【2h】

Evaluation of a Digital Consultation and Self-Care Advice Tool in Primary Care: A Multi-Methods Study

机译:初级保健中数字咨询和自我护理咨询工具的评估:多方法研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Digital services are often regarded as a solution to the growing demands on primary care services. Provision of a tool offering advice to support self-management as well as the ability to digitally consult with a General Practitioner (GP) has the potential to alleviate some of the pressure on primary care. This paper reports on a Phase II, 6-month evaluation of eConsult, a web-based triage and consultation system that was piloted across 11 GP practices across Scotland. Through a multi-method approach the evaluation explored eConsult use across practices, exposing both barriers and facilitators to its adoption. Findings suggest that expectations that eConsult would offer an additional and alternative method of accessing GP services were largely met. However, there is less certainty that it has fulfilled expectations of promoting self-help. In addition, low uptake meant that evaluation of current effectiveness was difficult for practices to quantify. The presence of an eConsult champion(s) within the practice was seen to be a significant factor in ensuring successful integration of the tool. A lack of patient and staff engagement, insufficient support and lack of protocols around processes were seen as barriers to its success.
机译:数字服务通常被认为是对初级保健服务不断增长的需求的解决方案。提供能够提供建议以支持自我管理的工具以及与全科医生(GP)进行数字咨询的能力,有可能减轻对初级保健的一些压力。本文报告了eConsult的第二阶段,为期六个月的评估,eConsult是一个基于网络的分类和咨询系统,已在苏格兰的11个GP实务中进行了试验。通过多方法方法,评估探索了跨实践使用eConsult的方法,从而为采用eConsult带来了障碍和便利。调查结果表明,人们对eConsult将提供访问GP服务的其他替代方法的期望得到了满足。但是,几乎没有确定的是它满足了促进自助的期望。此外,吸收率低意味着难以量化目前的效果。实践中,eConsult支持者的存在被认为是确保成功集成该工具的重要因素。缺乏患者和工作人员的参与,缺乏足够的支持以及缺乏有关流程的协议,这被视为其成功的障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号