首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research >Are Dementia Patients Engagement Using Tailored Stimuli the Same? The Apathy Dilemma in Nursing Home Residents
【2h】

Are Dementia Patients Engagement Using Tailored Stimuli the Same? The Apathy Dilemma in Nursing Home Residents

机译:痴呆患者使用量身定制的刺激方式是否相同?疗养院居民的冷漠困境

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background. Apathy is the most frequent behavioural disturbance understanding how apathy drives engagement in resident's activities of interests is a milestone to better understanding and tailored challenging interventions targeting engagement enhancement. Method. Residents aged 60 and older with dementia according to the ICD 10 from four nursing homes in the south east of France. A set of 25 stimuli were used and categorized by participant into Work, Leisure, Family, or Personal categories, an additional “not interested” category was used for comparison of engagement. The participants stimuli allocation was randomized in guided and unguided situations over a two-week period with 15minute interaction for each stimulus (n = 2) of each category (5×(15 min×2)). Clinical trial identifier: . Results. The mean age, 95% confidence interval (CI) of the 40 participants was 85.4 (83.8–87) with a mean MMSE score, CI95% of 17.7 (16.5–19). Analyses revealed a significant superiority effect of guidance over unguided interaction in duration of engagement in all categories of interest except for the stimulus category “family” and all P < .05. Apathetic participants when guided had longer engagement duration in stimulus Leisure and Personal (all P < .01). Conclusion. Guidance and better activities of interest can lead to enhanced engagement time in participants with dementia.
机译:背景。冷漠是最常见的行为障碍,了解冷漠如何促使人们参与到居民的兴趣活动中,这是更好地了解和针对性地提高参与度的有挑战性的干预措施的一个里程碑。方法。根据ICD 10,年龄在60岁及以上的痴呆症患者来自法国东南部的四个疗养院。参与者使用了一组25种刺激,并将其分为工作,休闲,家庭或个人类别,另外还有一个“不感兴趣”类别用于比较参与度。参与者的刺激分配在为期两周的有指导和无指导的情况下被随机分配,每个类别(5×(15 2min×2))的每个刺激(n = 2)的互动时间为15分钟。临床试验标识符:。结果。 40名参与者的平均年龄,95%置信区间(CI)为85.4(83.8–87),MMSE平均得分为17.7(16.5–19)的CI95%。分析表明,在所有感兴趣的类别中,除了刺激类别“家庭”和所有P <.05以外,在非持续性互动中,指导比非指导性交互具有明显的优越性。在指导下,无动于衷的参与者在休闲和个人刺激中的参与时间更长(所有P <.01)。结论。指导和更好的兴趣活动可以导致痴呆症参与者的参与时间增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号