首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine >Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) versus plastic stents for EUS-guided drainage of walled-off necrosis (WON) (LVPWON): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial
【2h】

Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) versus plastic stents for EUS-guided drainage of walled-off necrosis (WON) (LVPWON): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

机译:用于EUS引导的壁坏死(WON)(LVPWON)的管腔金属支架(LAMS)与塑料支架的比较:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundEndoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided drainage has become the first-line therapy for late peri-pancreatic fluid collection (PFC). Double pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) and lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) are commonly used for PFC drainage. Recently, a multi-institutional consensus on PFC drainage has recommended that LAMS should be the standard care for patients with walled-off necrosis (WON). However, given the poor quality of evidence, we aim to perform a large-scale randomized controlled trial to determine whether LAMS is superior to DPPS for WON drainage.
机译:背景技术内镜超声检查(EUS)引导引流已成为晚期胰周液收集(PFC)的一线治疗。双尾纤塑料支架(DPPS)和内腔金属支架(LAMS)通常用于PFC引流。最近,关于PFC引流的多机构共识建议LAMS应该成为围壁坏死(WON)患者的标准护理。但是,鉴于证据质量较差,我们旨在进行大规模的随机对照试验,以确定LAMS是否优于WPS引流的DPPS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号