首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine >Debate: When should we intervene in unstable angina - Time for an old look?
【2h】

Debate: When should we intervene in unstable angina - Time for an old look?

机译:辩论:我们什么时候应该干预不稳定的心绞痛-是时候换个老样子了?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Current treatment modalities for patients with acute coronary syndromes center on early diagnosis, risk stratification and, increasingly, early treatment including invasive approaches. The appropriate timing of these invasive modalities in the context of the overall treatment program remains an area of controversy. Specifically, studies in the past recommended a period of medical 'stabilization' while current approaches are considerably more aggressive. The potential hazard of early intervention, in particular, has not properly been weighed against the benefit. This article hopes to provide a framework for examining the appropriate timing of intervention, specifically percutaneous coronary intervention, in acute coronary syndromes.
机译:急性冠状动脉综合征的当前治疗方式集中在早期诊断,风险分层以及越来越多的包括侵入性方法在内的早期治疗。在整个治疗方案中这些侵入性方式的适当时机仍然是一个有争议的领域。具体而言,过去的研究建议在一段时间内实现医学的“稳定”,而目前的方法则更具侵略性。尤其是,并未适当权衡早期干预的潜在危害与收益。本文希望为检查急性冠脉综合征的适当干预时机提供框架,特别是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号