首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Comparative Medicine >Assessment of Blood Collection from the Lateral Saphenous Vein for Microfilaria Counts in Mongolian Gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) Infected with Brugia pahangi
【2h】

Assessment of Blood Collection from the Lateral Saphenous Vein for Microfilaria Counts in Mongolian Gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) Infected with Brugia pahangi

机译:从大隐静脉感染的蒙古沙鼠(Meriones unguiculatus)的侧隐静脉采集的血液中的微丝aria计数评估。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The NIH guidelines for survival bleeding of mice and rats note that using the retroorbital plexus has a greater potential for complications than do other methods of blood collection and that this procedure should be performed on anesthetized animals. Lateral saphenous vein puncture has a low potential for complications and can be performed without anesthesia. Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) are the preferred rodent model for filarial parasite research. To monitor microfilaria counts in the blood, blood sampling from the orbital plexus has been the standard. Our goal was to refine the blood collection technique. To determine whether blood collection from the lateral saphenous vein was a feasible alternative to retroorbital sampling, we compared microfilaria counts in blood samples collected by both methods from 21 gerbils infected with the filarial parasitic worm Brugia pahangi. Lateral saphenous vein counts were equivalent to retroorbital counts at relatively high counts (greater than 50 microfilariae per 20 µL) but were significantly lower than retroorbital counts when microfilarial concentrations were lower. Our results indicate that although retroorbital collection may be preferable when low concentrations of microfilariae need to be enumerated, the lateral saphenous vein is a suitable alternative site for blood sampling to determine microfilaremia and is a feasible refinement that can benefit the wellbeing of gerbils.
机译:NIH关于小鼠和大鼠存活出血的指南指出,与其他采血方法相比,使用眶后神经丛具有更大的并发症发生可能性,并且该过程应在麻醉的动物上进行。隐性大隐静脉穿刺的可能性很低,无需麻醉即可进行。蒙古沙鼠(Meriones unguiculatus)是丝虫寄生虫研究的首选啮齿动物模型。为了监测血液中的微丝aria计数,从眼眶神经丛采血已成为标准。我们的目标是完善采血技术。为了确定从大隐静脉外侧收集血液是否可以代替眶后采样,我们比较了两种方法收集的从感染了丝虫寄生虫布鲁吉亚·帕汉吉(Brugia pahangi)的21只沙鼠获得的血液样本中的微丝aria计数。大隐静脉的外侧计数与眶后计数相当,但计数较高(每20 µL大于50个微丝aria),但当微丝浓度较低时,显着低于眶后计数。我们的结果表明,尽管当需要枚举低浓度的微丝aria时,最好采用眶后收集,但隐隐外侧静脉是血液采样以确定微丝ar病的合适替代部位,并且是可行的改良方法,可有益于沙鼠的健康。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号