首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Molecular Pathology >Comparison of Vitek and Cobas Micro systems with a semiautomated conventional microsystem for identification and susceptibility testing of gram negative bacilli.
【2h】

Comparison of Vitek and Cobas Micro systems with a semiautomated conventional microsystem for identification and susceptibility testing of gram negative bacilli.

机译:比较Vitek和Cobas Micro系统与半自动常规微系统对革兰氏阴性杆菌的鉴定和药敏测试。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIMS--To compare the sensitivity and specificity of two semiautomated systems against a conventional (MIC 2000) test system for the identification and antibiotic susceptibility of Gram negative bacteria. METHODS--Clinical isolates of Gram negative bacilli (188 urinary and 229 non-urinary strains) were identified and tested for antibiotic susceptibility in the Cobas Micro and MIC 2000 systems. Of these, 359 strains were then tested in the Vitek and MIC 2000 systems. Two hundred and forty three strains were tested in all three systems immediately after isolation. Forty three were also tested only in the Vitek and MIC 2000 systems immediately after isolation. The remaining 174 strains were tested after storage at -20 degrees C for several months. RESULTS--The Cobas Micro and MIC 2000 systems agreed on the identification of 310 of the 417 (74.3%) strains; the Vitek and MIC 2000 systems agreed on 338 of the 359 (94.2%) strains. The Cobas Micro system correctly identified 86.8% of strains tested after storage and 65.4% of those immediately after isolation. Organism-antibiotic combinations (non-urinary isolates) were tested in the Cobas Micro and MIC 2000 systems (n = 2335), in the Vitek and MIC 2000 systems (n = 999). Essential correlation (complete agreement plus minor errors) was observed in 98% (with 90% complete agreement) in the former and in 97% (with 86% complete agreement) in the latter. For the urinary isolates, 1949 organism-antibiotic combinations were analysed in the Cobas Micro and MIC 2000 systems where complete agreement was observed in 92% (with 3% very major discrepancies), for 1382 urinary organism-antibiotic combinations tested in the Vitek and MIC 2000 systems, the figures were 95% and 2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS--The Vitek system is highly accurate in the identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing of Gram negative bacteria. The Cobas Micro system has many shortcomings in its identification of Gram negative rods, especially freshly isolated strains, but it is comparable with the Vitek system in antibiotic susceptibility testing.
机译:目的-比较两个半自动化系统与常规(MIC 2000)测试系统的灵敏度和特异性,以鉴定和鉴定革兰氏阴性细菌。方法-在Cobas Micro和MIC 2000系统中鉴定出革兰氏阴性细菌的临床分离株(188例泌尿系和229例非泌尿系),并测试了其药敏性。然后,在Vitek和MIC 2000系统中测试了359个菌株。分离后立即在所有三个系统中测试了243个菌株。隔离后,仅在Vitek和MIC 2000系统中也对43个进行了测试。剩余的174个菌株在-20摄氏度下存储几个月后进行测试。结果– Cobas Micro和MIC 2000系统同意鉴定417株(74.3%)中的310株; Vitek和MIC 2000系统对359个菌株中的338个(94.2%)达成了一致。 Cobas Micro系统正确识别了存储后测试的菌株的86.8%和分离后立即鉴定的菌株的65.4%。在Cobas Micro和MIC 2000系统(n = 2335),Vitek和MIC 2000系统(n = 999)中测试了生物体-抗生素组合(非尿液分离株)。在前者中有98%(完全同意占90%),而在后者中有97%(完全同意占86%),观察到了基本的相关性(完全同意加轻微错误)。对于尿液分离物,在Cobas Micro和MIC 2000系统中分析了1949种生物体-抗生素组合,其中在Vitek和MIC中测试的1382种泌尿有机物-抗生素组合中92%完全一致(有3%的重大差异)。在2000个系统中,数字分别为95%和2%。结论-Vitek系统在革兰氏阴性菌的鉴定和抗生素敏感性测试中非常准确。 Cobas Micro系统在鉴定革兰氏阴性棒,尤其是新鲜分离的菌株方面存在许多缺陷,但在抗生素敏感性测试中与Vitek系统相当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号