首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Molecular Pathology >Comparison of a modified thiazole orange technique with a fully automated analyser for reticulocyte counting.
【2h】

Comparison of a modified thiazole orange technique with a fully automated analyser for reticulocyte counting.

机译:改进的噻唑橙技术与全自动分析仪对网织红细胞计数的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two independent methods for quantitating reticulocyte counts were compared. One used a modified thiazole orange technique and a flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson FACS); the other was a fully automated whole blood analyser (Sysmex R1000). Both methods gave comparable results with a coefficient of variation of less than 5%. Samples measured using the R1000 showed a negligible decrease in the reticulocyte count over five days at room temperature, although there was evidence of continuing intracellular maturation: with thiazole orange there was an apparent increase. A practical reference range of 20-70 x 10(9)/l was established from 89 normal subjects. The close correlation between the two independent estimates indicates the validity of the quantitation of the reticulocyte count and shows that automation allows significant changes within and below the normal range to be detected with a degree of reliability which was not previously possible.
机译:比较了定量网织红细胞计数的两种独立方法。一种使用改良的噻唑橙技术和流式细胞仪(Becton Dickinson FACS);另一台是全自动全血分析仪(Sysmex R1000)。两种方法均给出了可比的结果,变异系数小于5%。使用R1000测量的样品在室温下五天之内的网织红细胞数量的减少可忽略不计,尽管有证据表明细胞内的持续成熟:噻唑橙明显增加。从89名正常受试者中确定了20-70 x 10(9)/ l的实际参考范围。两个独立估计值之间的密切相关性表明网织红细胞计数定量的有效性,并表明自动化技术可以检测到正常范围内和正常范围内的显着变化,而这种变化是以前不可能实现的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号