首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Molecular Pathology >A comparison of the absorbed fluorescent treponemal antibody (FTA-ABS) test and other screening tests for treponemal disease in patients attending a venereal disease clinic
【2h】

A comparison of the absorbed fluorescent treponemal antibody (FTA-ABS) test and other screening tests for treponemal disease in patients attending a venereal disease clinic

机译:在性病诊所就诊的患者中吸收性荧光性视网膜色素上皮抗体(FTA-ABS)与其他筛查方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Screening tests—absorbed fluorescent treponemal (FTA-ABS), the Reiter protein complement-fixation (RPCFT), VDRL slide test, automated reagin—and cardiolipin Wassermann reaction—were carried out on 1922 consecutive new patients attending the Whitechapel Clinic over a three-month period.Taking the FTA-ABS test results as an index, the most efficient combination of conventional tests was found to be the RPCFT and automated reagin test. The cardiolipin WR proved to be under-sensitive and of little value compared with the other tests.Forty-two per cent of the 107 sera reactive in the FTA-ABS test were not detected by the RPCFT or ART tests. An assessment based on the TPI test results and clinical findings in these patients is presented.The scope and limitations of the FTA-ABS test as a screening procedure are discussed.
机译:筛查试验包括1922年连续三天在Whitechapel诊所就诊的连续22例新患者,进行了吸收性荧光色蛋白(FTA-ABS),Reiter蛋白补体固定(RPCFT),VDRL玻片试验,自动血尿素反应和心磷脂Wassermann反应。以FTA-ABS测试结果为指标,发现常规测试最有效的组合是RPCFT和自动血脂测试。与其他测试相比,心磷脂WR表现为敏感性低,价值不高.RPCFT或ART测试未检测到FTA-ABS测试中107份反应性血清中的42%。根据这些患者的TPI测试结果和临床表现进行评估。讨论了FTA-ABS测试作为筛选程序的范围和局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号