首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Epidemiology >Homogeneity in prediction of survival probabilities for subcategories of hipprosthesis data: the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association 2000–2013
【2h】

Homogeneity in prediction of survival probabilities for subcategories of hipprosthesis data: the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association 2000–2013

机译:均质性预测髋关节假体数据亚类的生存率:北欧人工关节置换协会2000–2013年

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

>Introduction: The four countries in the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) share geographic proximity, culture, and ethnicity. Pooling data from different sources in order to obtain higher precision and accuracy of survival-probability estimates is appealing. Nevertheless, survival probabilities of hip replacements vary between the countries. As such, risk prediction for individual patients within countries may be problematic if data are merged. In this study, our primary question was to address when data merging for estimating prosthesis survival in subcategories of patients is advantageous for survival prediction of individual patients, and at what sample sizes this may be advised.>Methods: Patients undergoing total hip replacements for osteoarthritis between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2013 in the four Nordic countries were studied. A total of 184,507 patients were stratified into 360 patient subcategories based on country, age-group, sex, fixation, head size, and articulation. For each patient category, we determined the sample size needed from a single country to obtain a more accurate and precise estimate of prosthesis-survival probability at 5 and 10 years compared to an estimate using data from all countries. The comparison was done using mean-square error.>Results: We found large variations in the sample size needed, ranging from 40 to 2,060 hips, before an estimate from a single Nordic country was more accurate and precise than estimates based on the NARA data.>Conclusion: Using pooled survival-probability estimates for individual risk prediction may be imprecise if there is heterogeneity in the pooled data sources. By applying mean-square error, we demonstrate that for small sample sizes, applying the larger NARA database may provide a more accurate and precise estimate; however, this effect is not consistent and varies with the characteristics of the subcategory.
机译:>简介:北欧人工关节成形术注册协会(NARA)的四个国家/地区在地理位置,文化和种族方面都有共同点。汇集来自不同来源的数据以获得更高的生存概率估计值的准确性和吸引力是很有吸引力的。然而,各国之间髋关节置换术的生存可能性各不相同。因此,如果合并数据,则对国家内部单个患者的风险预测可能会出现问题。在这项研究中,我们的主要问题是要解决何时合并数据以估计患者亚类中的假体存活率是否有利于单个患者的生存预测,以及建议采用何种样本量。>方法:对四个北欧国家在2000年1月1日至2013年12月31日期间接受全髋关节置换术治疗骨关节炎的情况进行了研究。根据国家,年龄组,性别,固定方式,头部大小和发音,将总共184,507名患者分为360个患者亚类。对于每种患者类别,我们确定了从一个国家/地区获得的样本量,以与使用来自所有国家/地区的数据进行估算相比,能够更准确,更准确地估算5年和10年假体生存率。比较是使用均方误差完成的。>结果:我们发现所需的样本量存在较大差异,范围从40到2,060髋,而单个北欧国家/地区的估计值要比该估计值更为准确和精确。 >结论:如果汇总数据源中存在异质性,则将汇总的生存概率估算用于个人风险预测可能不准确。通过应用均方误差,我们证明了对于较小的样本量,使用较大的NARA数据库可能会提供更准确准确的估计;但是,这种效果并不一致,并随子类别的特征而变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号