首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine >Comparison of type I and type II bovine viral diarrhea virus infection in swine.
【2h】

Comparison of type I and type II bovine viral diarrhea virus infection in swine.

机译:猪中I型和II型牛病毒性腹泻病毒感染的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Some isolates of type II bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) are capable of causing severe clinical disease in cattle. Bovine viral diarrhea virus infection has been reported in pigs, but the ability of these more virulent isolates of type II BVDV to induce severe clinical disease in pigs is unknown. It was our objective to compare clinical, virologic, and pathologic findings between type I and type II BVDV infection in pigs. Noninfected control and BVDV-infected 2-month-old pigs were used. A noncytopathic type I and a noncytopathic type II BVDV isolate were chosen for evaluation in feeder age swine based upon preliminary in vitro and in vivo experiments. A dose titration study was performed using 4 groups of 4 pigs for each viral isolate. The groups were inoculated intranasally with either sham (control), 10(3), 10(5), or 10(7) TCID50 of virus. The pigs were examined daily and clinical findings were recorded. Antemortem and postmortem samples were collected for virus isolation. Neither the type I nor type II BVDV isolates resulted in clinical signs of disease in pigs. Bovine viral diarrhea virus was isolated from antemortem and postmortem samples from groups of pigs receiving the 10(5) and the 10(7) TCID50 dose of the type I BVDV isolate. In contrast, BVDV was only isolated from postmortem samples in the group of pigs receiving the 10(7) TCID50 dose of the type II BVDV isolate. Type I BVDV was able to establish infection in pigs at lower doses by intranasal instillation than type II BVDV. Infection of pigs with a type II isolate of BVDV known to cause severe disease in calves did not result in clinically apparent disease in pigs.
机译:某些II型牛病毒性腹泻病毒(BVDV)分离株能够在牛中引起严重的临床疾病。据报道,猪中存在牛病毒性腹泻病毒感染,但是这些II型BVDV更具毒性的分离物在猪中引起严重临床疾病的能力尚不清楚。我们的目的是比较猪的I型和II型BVDV感染之间的临床,病毒学和病理学发现。使用未感染的对照和BVDV感染的2个月大的猪。基于初步的体外和体内实验,选择了非I型和非II型BVDV分离株用于饲养期猪的评估。每个病毒分离株使用4组4只猪的4组进行剂量滴定研究。将这些组鼻内接种假病毒(对照),10(3),10(5)或10(7)TCID50病毒。每天检查猪并记录临床发现。收集死前和死后样品用于病毒分离。 I型和II型BVDV分离株均未导致猪的疾病临床症状。从接受10(5)和10(7)TCID50剂量的I型BVDV分离株的猪群的死前和死后样品中分离牛病毒性腹泻病毒。相反,BVDV仅从接受10(7)TCID50剂量的II型BVDV分离株的猪的死后样品中分离出来。与II型BVDV相比,通过鼻内滴注,I型BVDV能够以较低剂量在猪中建立感染。用已知会引起小牛严重疾病的BVDV II型分离株感染猪,不会导致猪出现临床上明显的疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号