首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cambridge Open Access >Comparing Physical Exercise in Groups to Group Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for the Treatment of Panic Disorder in a Randomized Controlled Trial
【2h】

Comparing Physical Exercise in Groups to Group Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for the Treatment of Panic Disorder in a Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:在随机对照试验中比较团体运动与集体认知行为疗法治疗恐慌症的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Previous studies have suggested that physical exercise can reduce symptoms for subjects suffering from panic disorder (PD). The efficacy of this intervention has so far not been compared to an established psychotherapy, such as cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT). Assessment of controlled long-term effects and the clinical significance of the treatment are also lacking. >Aim: To compare physical exercise to CBT as treatment for PD, and assess controlled long-term and clinically significant effects. >Method: PD-patients were randomized to either three weekly sessions of physical exercise (n = 17), or one weekly session of CBT (n = 19). Both treatments ran for 12 weeks, were manualized and administered in groups. Patients were assessed twice before the start of treatment, at post-treatment and at 6 and 12 months thereafter. Primary outcome-measures consisted of the Mobility Inventory (MI), the Agoraphobia Cognitions Questionnaire (ACQ) and the Body Sensations Questionnaire (BSQ). >Results: A two-way repeated measures MANOVA of these measures demonstrated a significant effect of time, F(16, 544) = 7.28, p < .01, as well as a significant interaction effect, F(16, 544) = 1.71, p < .05, in favour of CBT. This finding was supported by the assessment of clinically significant changes of avoidant behaviour and of treatment-seeking one year later. >Conclusion: Group CBT is more effective than group physical exercise as treatment of panic disorder, both immediately following treatment and at follow-up assessments.
机译:>背景:先前的研究表明,体育锻炼可以减轻恐慌症(PD)患者的症状。迄今为止,这种干预的功效尚未与既定的心理疗法(如认知行为疗法(CBT))相提并论。还缺乏对可控制的长期效果的评估和治疗的临床意义。 >目标:比较体育锻炼与CBT作为PD的治疗方法,并评估可控制的长期和临床显着效果。 >方法:将PD患者随机分为三周进行一次体育锻炼(n = 17)或一周进行一次CBT(n = 19)。两种治疗方法均运行了12周,并进行了手动操作和分组给药。在治疗开始前,治疗后以及之后的6和12个月对患者进行了两次评估。主要结局指标包括流动性调查表(MI),恐惧症认知问卷(ACQ)和身体感觉问卷(BSQ)。 >结果:通过两次重复测量,这些方法的MANOVA证明了时间的显着影响F(16,544)= 7.28,p <.01,以及显着的交互作用F( 16,544)= 1.71,p <.05,从而支持CBT。这一发现得到了对避免行为的临床显着变化和一年后寻求治疗的评估的支持。 >结论:无论是在治疗后还是在随访评估中,CBT组都比组体育锻炼更有效地治疗恐慌症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号