首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cambridge Open Access >Online market research panel members as controls in case–control studies to investigate gastrointestinal disease outbreaks: early experiences and lessons learnt from the UK
【2h】

Online market research panel members as controls in case–control studies to investigate gastrointestinal disease outbreaks: early experiences and lessons learnt from the UK

机译:在线市场研究小组成员作为病例对照研究的对照以调查胃肠道疾病暴发:英国的早期经验和教训

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Established methods of recruiting population controls for case–control studies to investigate gastrointestinal disease outbreaks can be time consuming, resulting in delays in identifying the source or vehicle of infection. After an initial evaluation of using online market research panel members as controls in a case–control study to investigate a Salmonella outbreak in 2013, this method was applied in four further studies in the UK between 2014 and 2016. We used data from all five studies and interviews with members of each outbreak control team and market research panel provider to review operational issues, evaluate risk of bias in this approach and consider methods to reduce confounding and bias. The investigators of each outbreak reported likely time and cost savings from using market research controls. There were systematic differences between case and control groups in some studies but no evidence that conclusions on the likely source or vehicle of infection were incorrect. Potential selection biases introduced by using this sampling frame and the low response rate are unclear. Methods that might reduce confounding and some bias should be balanced with concerns for overmatching. Further evaluation of this approach using comparisons with traditional methods and population-based exposure survey data is recommended.
机译:为病例对照研究招募人群控制措施以调查胃肠道疾病暴发的既定方法可能很耗时,导致确定感染源或媒介的延迟。在通过在线市场研究小组成员作为病例对照研究调查2013年沙门氏菌爆发的对照进行初步评估后,该方法在2014年至2016年间在英国的四项进一步研究中得到了应用。我们使用了全部五项研究的数据以及与每个爆发控制团队和市场研究小组提供者的访谈,以审查运营问题,评估采用这种方法的偏见风险并考虑减少混淆和偏见的方法。每次爆发的调查人员报告说,使用市场研究控制措施可能会节省时间和成本。在某些研究中,病例组和对照组之间存在系统性差异,但没有证据表明有关可能的感染源或媒介的结论是不正确的。通过使用此采样帧和低响应率引入的潜在选择偏差尚不清楚。可能减少混淆和某些偏见的方法应与过度匹配的问题相平衡。建议使用与传统方法的比较和基于人群的接触调查数据对该方法进行进一步评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号